In re: Gore

407 F. App'x 765
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 2011
Docket10-2365
StatusUnpublished

This text of 407 F. App'x 765 (In re: Gore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Gore, 407 F. App'x 765 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to void the judgment. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the motion December 10, 2010. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Gore’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
407 F. App'x 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gore-ca4-2011.