In re Gore

539 F. App'x 135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 3, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1919
StatusPublished

This text of 539 F. App'x 135 (In re Gore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gore, 539 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed issuing a ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay by the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 F. App'x 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gore-ca4-2013.