In re Gore

Fourth Circuit

In re Gore

539 F. App'x 135

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 2013·No. No. 13-1919·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed issuing a ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay by the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Lee Gore petitions for a writ of mandamus, claiming that the district court has unduly delayed issuing a ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay by the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Gore, 539 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

539 F. App'x 135 (In re Gore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related