In re Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Goldstein

176 A.D.2d 572, 574 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13562

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 176 A.D.2d 572 (In re Goldstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Goldstein, 176 A.D.2d 572, 574 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13562 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

—Respondent is directed to show cause before the Departmental Disciplinary Committee why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made, and pending final determination of the petition, respondent is suspended from [573]*573practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York effective immediately and until the further order of this Court. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Respondent is directed to show cause before the Departmental Disciplinary Committee why a final order of censure, suspension or disbarment should not be made, and pending final determination of the petition, respondent is suspended from [573]*573practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York effective immediately and until the further order of this Court. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D.2d 572, 574 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-goldstein-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack