In Re Go

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re Go

992 A.2d 109

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 7, 2010

Docket438 EAL 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 992 A.2d 109 (In Re Go) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Go, 992 A.2d 109 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

992 A.2d 109 (2010)

In the Interest of G.O.,
Appeal of G.O.

No. 438 EAL 2009.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 7, 2010.

110 ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Order of the Superior Court affirming the dispositional order adjudicating Petitioner delinquent is VACATED. The Superior Court erred by failing to address Petitioner's Confrontation Clause issue. The case is REMANDED for reconsideration of that issue in light of Commonwealth v. Allshouse, ___ Pa. ___, 985 A.2d 847 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

992 A.2d 109 (2010)

In the Interest of G.O.,
Appeal of G.O.

No. 438 EAL 2009.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 7, 2010.

110 ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of April, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Order of the Superior Court affirming the dispositional order adjudicating Petitioner delinquent is VACATED. The Superior Court erred by failing to address Petitioner's Confrontation Clause issue. The case is REMANDED for reconsideration of that issue in light of Commonwealth v. Allshouse, ___ Pa. ___, 985 A.2d 847 (2009).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

992 A.2d 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-go-pa-2010.

Opinion

In the Interest of G.O., Appeal of G.O.

*110 ORDER

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

In the Interest of G.O.,
Appeal of G.O.

110 ORDER*