Home/Customs and Patent Appeals/In re Glass

In re Glass

492 F.2d 1228, 181 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 31, 1974 CCPA LEXIS 194
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedFebruary 28, 1974
DocketPatent Appeal No. 9077
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 492 F.2d 1228 (In re Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Glass, 492 F.2d 1228, 181 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 31, 1974 CCPA LEXIS 194 (ccpa 1974).

Opinions

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of all claims remaining in application serial No. 664,879 filed August 31, 1967, entitled “Whiskers.” We affirm.

The Invention

The term “whiskers” is the technical name for long, needle-like, linear crystals grown artifically from the vapor phase of such crystal-producing materials as aluminum oxide, silicon nitride,

[1229]*1229graphite, boron, sapphire, etc.1 The appealed claims are directed to both apparatus and method. The whiskers are said to have very high strength and according to one prior art reference 2 have utility for reinforcing refractory materi-ais. The application contains the following drawing:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green Edge Enterprises, LLC v. Rubber Mulch Etc., LLC
620 F.3d 1287 (Federal Circuit, 2010)
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC
731 F. Supp. 2d 348 (D. New Jersey, 2010)
Eli Lilly and Co. v. SICOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
705 F. Supp. 2d 971 (S.D. Indiana, 2010)
Automotive Technologies International, Inc. v. Siemens VDO Automotive Corp.
669 F. Supp. 2d 836 (E.D. Michigan, 2009)
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Dudas
511 F. Supp. 2d 81 (District of Columbia, 2007)
Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.
126 F. Supp. 2d 69 (D. Massachusetts, 2001)
Martin Gardner Reiffin v. Microsoft Corporation
214 F.3d 1342 (Federal Circuit, 2000)
Access Solutions International, Inc. v. Data/Ware Development, Inc.
70 F. Supp. 2d 92 (D. Rhode Island, 1999)
Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. Boone
146 F.3d 1348 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard Keilhauer
51 F.3d 1560 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
United States Steel Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
865 F.2d 1247 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
United States Steel Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum Company
865 F.2d 1247 (Federal Circuit, 1989)
Refac International Ltd. v. IBM
689 F. Supp. 422 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
In Re Gilbert P. Hyatt
852 F.2d 1292 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
Spectra-Physics, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Coherent, Inc., Appellant/cross
827 F.2d 1524 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Gordon Gould v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
822 F.2d 1074 (Federal Circuit, 1987)
Technicon Instruments Corp. v. Alpkem Corp.
664 F. Supp. 1558 (D. Oregon, 1986)
In Re Robert L. Lundak
773 F.2d 1216 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
White Consolidated Industries, Inc., Appellant/cross v. Vega Servo-Control, Inc., Appellee/cross
713 F.2d 788 (Federal Circuit, 1983)
United States Department of Energy v. Daugherty
687 F.2d 438 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 F.2d 1228, 181 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 31, 1974 CCPA LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-glass-ccpa-1974.