In re Get Young

27 P. 158, 90 Cal. 77, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 886
California Supreme Court·Decided June 30, 1891·No. No. 13301·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Foote, C.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to revoke an order granting letters of guardianship of a minor.

The order made by the probate court appointing the [78] guardian was one which it was within the jurisdiction of that tribunal to make, and it was itself appealable. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 963, subd. 3.)

Hence the appellate court will not entertain jurisdiction of the appeal now here. (Goyhinech v. Goyhinech, 80 Cal. 409; Larkin v. Larkin, 76 Cal. 323; Eureka & T. R. R. Co. v. McGrath, 74 Cal. 49; Tripp v. Santa Rosa R. R. Co., 69 Cal. 631.)

The matter does not come within the rule as to void judgments laid down in People v. Green, 74 Cal. 400; 5 Am. St. Rep. 448.

We therefore advise that the appeal be dismissed.

Fitzgerald, C., and Belcher, C., concurred.

The Court.

— For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Get Young, 27 P. 158, 90 Cal. 77, 1891 Cal. LEXIS 886 (Cal. 1891).

27 P. 158 (In re Get Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spurrier v. Spurrier
1925 OK 506 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. Vivas
20 P.R. 99 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1914)
American Railroad v. Quiñones
17 P.R. 247 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1911)
American Railroad Co. v. Quiñones
17 P.R. Dec. 261 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1911)