In re Gehris-Herbine Co.

188 F. 502, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1911
DocketNo. 3,844
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 188 F. 502 (In re Gehris-Herbine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gehris-Herbine Co., 188 F. 502, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255 (E.D. Pa. 1911).

Opinion

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

[1] The petition and adjudication in this case were filed and entered in September, 1910, and therefore tile right of the trustee to the property now in question is governed by section 8 of the amending act of June 25, 1910 (chapter 412, 36 Stat. 840), which provides that:

“Trustees * * * as to all property not in the custody of the bankruptcy court shall be deemed vested with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a judgment creditor holding an execution duly returned unsatisfied.”

Decisions holding that a trustee has no other right than belonged to the bankrupt are no longer controlling. It seems also to be conceded by the claimant, the Jenckes Knitting Machine Company, that, although the contract may have been made in Rhode Island, the right of the trustee is to be tested by the law of Pennsylvania.

[2] Tested therefore by that law, what is the true character of the contract in question? Is it a bailment, or a conditional sale? If it is really and in good faith a bailment, it is valid not only between the parties but against creditors also; for a man does not lose the title to his property by hiring it to another, although he may have parted with the possession and the other may have acquired it. But, if he has really sold it and has also parted with the possession, he will find in numerous jurisdictions — in Pennsylvania, for example — that he cannot enforce against execution creditors a condition that he is to retain the title until the price is paid. These rules are too well known to need the support of citation. The facts of the present case, as set forth in the careful report of the learned referee, are in substance as follows:

The bankrupt manufactured hosiery in Reading, Pa., and the claimant manufactures knitting machines in Pawtucket, R. I. Jn March, 1910, the claimant’s Pennsylvania agent visited Reading in the effort to sell machines. The best terms the bankrupt would offer were one-third cash in 30 days from shipment, and two-thirds in notes at three, six, and nine months, respectively. The agent and the bankrupt agreed upon these terms, hut the bankrupt also agreed to sign the contract hereinafter set forth, of which a copy was then [504]*504shown and read. Thereupon two orders were signed by the bankrupt; one being as follows:

Jenekes Knitting Machine Co., Pawtucket, E. I.
Beading, March 24, 1910.
Order No. 226.
For Gehris-Herbine Co.
City, Heading, Pa.Street, Pearl & Kerper.
State, Penna.
Ship via Beading By.
No. Machines, 10.
(Then follows technical description of machines.)
Price, $160.00 P. O. B. Pawtucket, B. I.
Terms, i/j Cash 30 days from date of shipment.
Balance in 3 notes, 3-6-9-montli notes.
Date, from date of shipment at 6%. '
Deliveries, as soon as possible on receipt of this order.
Bemarks: Want these machines as soon as possible to go in the new mill and will pay $30.00 additional for 3-C attachment if perfected, &c.
[Signed) The Gehris-Herbine Co.,
L. Howard Gehris, Sec. & Treas.

The claimant acknowledged receipt of these orders in the following letter:

Pawtucket, E. I., March 29, 1910.
Gehris-Herbine Co., 45 Beed St., Beading, Pa. — Gentlemen: >
We beg to acknowledge receipt through our Mr. Morningstar of your order for machinery, and have entered same for ten 200 needle 3% Invincible Machines, &c., at $150.00 each, and ten 220 needle 3% Invincible Machines, &c., at $181.50 each, f. o. b. Pawtucket; terms, one-third cash 30 days from date of shipment, balance in three equal notes of three, six, and nine months from date of shipment, to bear interest at 6%.
These machines to be on our lease plan.
We thank you for the order and will do all we can to hurry the machines along to you.
Very truly yours, Jenekes Knitting Mach. Co.

The machines were shipped in May and June, 1910, but were not put to use until the notes and two agreements or leases were signed. A sample note is as follows:

$436.25 Beading, Pa., May 28, 1910.
For value received, without defalcation three months after date we promise to pay to the order of the Jenekes Knitting Machine Co., four hundred and thirty-six and 25/100 dollars.
The consideration of this and other notes is the rent of the following described Invincible Knitting Machines, 7519-7528, 7114-7115, which we have received and hired of the Jenekes Knitting Machine Co., who shall have the right in case of nonpayment at maturity of any of said notes, without process' of law, to enter and retake, and may enter and retake immediate possession of the said property wherever it may be, and remove the same. Beferenee being made for details to the lease by the Jenekes Knitting Machine Co. to us of said machines.
Payable at B. I. Hospital Trust Co., Providence, B. I.
Due with int. at 6%. The Gehris-Herbine Co., Inc.
Chas. W. Herbine, President.
L. Howard Gehris, Treasurer.

At the same time the following agreement was signed (the other being of similar tenor):

This is to certify that the Gehris-Herbine Co. of Beading, Pennsylvania, has this day hired and received of the Jenekes Knitting Machine Company, [505]*505a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the state of Rhode Island, and located and doing business in the city of Pawtucket, county of Providence in said state, twelve Invincible Automatic Knitting Machines Nos. 7519-7.128. 7114-7115 valued at nineteen hundred sixty-tliree & 2%oo dollars ($'!,- 963.20) delivered by said .Tenches Knitting- Machine Company to said the Cehris-IIerbine Co., f. o. b. at said Pawtucket; said machines to be used a i their mill in Reading, county of Berks, state of Penna., and not to be removed therefrom without permission of said Jencltes Knitting Machine ■Company in writing first obtained, and hereby agree to pay said Jenekes Knitting Machine Company as follows: Six hundred fifty-four & u>/io.> dollars ($054.40) in cash on June 28th, 1910, and three notes, all dated May 2Rth, 1910, payable at R. I. Hospital Trust Co., Providence, R. I., with interest at O'/ó, as follows: two due 3 & 6 months for four hundred thirty-six & -Vioo dollars ($430.25) each and one due 9 months for four hundred thirty-six & 3%oo dollars ($436.30) for the use and rental of said machines until tile sum so paid for use and rental as aforesaid shall equal said sum of nineteen hundred sixty-tliree and 2<)/J00 dollars ($1,903.20) and to keep said machines insured to the full amount of nineteen hundred sixty-three

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re New York & Baltimore Inland Transp. Co.
276 F. 145 (D. Delaware, 1921)
In re A. E. Savage Baking Co.
259 F. 976 (D. New Jersey, 1919)
In re Eagle Ice & Coal Co.
241 F. 393 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1917)
In re Graboyes
233 F. 133 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1916)
Hinton v. . Williams
86 S.E. 994 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
In re Dancy Hardware & Furniture Co.
198 F. 336 (N.D. Alabama, 1912)
Federal Chemical Co. v. House
196 F. 990 (N.D. Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 F. 502, 1911 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gehris-herbine-co-paed-1911.