In re Gauvin

779 A.2d 645, 2001 R.I. LEXIS 196, 2001 WL 1090321
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedSeptember 5, 2001
DocketNo. 01-323-A
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 779 A.2d 645 (In re Gauvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Gauvin, 779 A.2d 645, 2001 R.I. LEXIS 196, 2001 WL 1090321 (R.I. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The plaintiff in this pending Superior Court case petitions for admission of Massachusetts attorney Pamela S. Gauvin to represent her in further proceedings before the Superior Court in this matter. The petition has been submitted to this Court on plaintiffs behalf by a member of the Rhode Island Bar who practices in a Fall River, Massachusetts law firm. Since Article II, Rule 9 of this Court’s rules places a number of responsibilities on the sponsoring Rhode Island attorney in cases involving pro hac vice counsel, we are of the opinion that the sponsoring Rhode Island attorney must be one who practices law out of a Rhode Island office.

Accordingly, upon consideration by a majority of the justices of this Court, the petition for admission pro hac vice is granted, provided, however, that Attorney Gauvin retain, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, a sponsoring mem[646]*646ber of the Rhode Island Bar who practices law in an office located in this state.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kristopher Plante v. Daniel Stack v. Bella Restaurant
109 A.3d 846 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 A.2d 645, 2001 R.I. LEXIS 196, 2001 WL 1090321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-gauvin-ri-2001.