In re Gaudin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Gaudin

869 So. 2d 793, 2004 La. LEXIS 856, 2004 WL 602075

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 26, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-0532·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[794]*794ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Pierre F. Gaudin, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 5977, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[794]*794ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

IT IS ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Pierre F. Gaudin, Jr., Louisiana Bar Roll number 5977, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

In re Gaudin, 869 So. 2d 793, 2004 La. LEXIS 856, 2004 WL 602075 (La. 2004).

Pincite

869 So. 2d 793 (In re Gaudin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related