In re Gaudin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Gaudin

894 So. 2d 1095, 2005 La. LEXIS 457, 2005 WL 434525

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 25, 2005

DocketNo. 2005-B-0033

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 894 So. 2d 1095 (In re Gaudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Gaudin, 894 So. 2d 1095, 2005 La. LEXIS 457, 2005 WL 434525 (La. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent improperly charged interest to clients on advances or loans made prior to settlement and failed to promptly remit funds to a third party. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which they stipulate respondent has made full restitution in both matters. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Pierre F. Gaudin, Louisiana Bar Roll number 5976, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent attend the Louisiana State Bar Association s Ethics School program and furnish proof to the ODC demonstrating he has successfully completed that program.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI