In re Frankfurt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Frankfurt

754 A.2d 543, 164 N.J. 596, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1000

DecidedJuly 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 754 A.2d 543 (In re Frankfurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frankfurt, 754 A.2d 543, 164 N.J. 596, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1000 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that STANLEY S. FRANKFURT formerly of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, and who thereafter was suspended from the practice of law by Order of the Court dated July 16, 1999, effective August 11, 1999, and who remains suspended at this time, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation and to treat all persons involved in the legal process with courtesy) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STANLEY S. FRANKFURT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that STANLEY S. FRANKFURT formerly of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, and who thereafter was suspended from the practice of law by Order of the Court dated July 16, 1999, effective August 11, 1999, and who remains suspended at this time, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation and to treat all persons involved in the legal process with courtesy) and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STANLEY S. FRANKFURT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

754 A.2d 543, 164 N.J. 596, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frankfurt-nj-2000.