In Re Frankfurt

732 A.2d 512, 159 N.J. 521, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 986
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJuly 16, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 732 A.2d 512 (In Re Frankfurt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Frankfurt, 732 A.2d 512, 159 N.J. 521, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 986 (N.J. 1999).

Opinion

*522 ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on April 16, 1999, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that STANLEY S. FRANKFURT formerly of PATERSON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months on the basis of respondent’s conviction of contempt of court and entry of a plea of guilty to a fourth-degree charge of stalking;

And the Board having further concluded that prior to reinstatement to practice respondent should be required to submit proof that he is psychologically fit to practice law;

And good cause appearing

It is ORDERED that STANLEY S. FRANKFURT is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective August 11,1999; and it is further

ORDERED that prior to any application for reinstatement to practice, respondent shall submit proof from a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics that respondent is fit to practice law; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further

*523 ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in 'the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. Beatty
972 A.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 A.2d 512, 159 N.J. 521, 1999 N.J. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frankfurt-nj-1999.