In re Frails
633 S.E.2d 492, 369 S.C. 530, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Frails. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 S.C. 431 →
Opinion
ORDER
Petitioner was suspended on June 12, 2006, for a period of sixty (60) days, credited against his more-than-six-month interim suspension. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.
The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.
By s/Daniel E. Shearouse
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Frails, 633 S.E.2d 492, 369 S.C. 530, 2006 S.C. LEXIS 252 (S.C. 2006).
633 S.E.2d 492 (In re Frails) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.