In re Frails

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Frails

597 S.E.2d 793, 359 S.C. 142, 2004 S.C. LEXIS 172

DecidedJune 1, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 597 S.E.2d 793 (In re Frails) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Frails, 597 S.E.2d 793, 359 S.C. 142, 2004 S.C. LEXIS 172 (S.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On February 5, 2002, respondent was administratively suspended from the practice of law after he failed to file a report of compliance with mandatory continuing legal education requirements for 2001. By order of this Court dated April 17, 2002, respondent was directed to surrender his certifícate to practice law. Respondent was subsequently placed on interim suspension. In the Matter of Frails, 356 S.C. 431, 589 S.E.2d 759 (2003). Respondent now petitions the Court to reinstate him to the practice of law.

After consideration of respondent’s submissions and all applicable rules, we hereby reinstate respondent to the practice of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

s/ James E. Moore, J.

s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J.

s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On February 5, 2002, respondent was administratively suspended from the practice of law after he failed to file a report of compliance with mandatory continuing legal education requirements for 2001. By order of this Court dated April 17, 2002, respondent was directed to surrender his certifícate to practice law. Respondent was subsequently placed on interim suspension. In the Matter of Frails, 356 S.C. 431, 589 S.E.2d 759 (2003). Respondent now petitions the Court to reinstate him to the practice of law.

After consideration of respondent’s submissions and all applicable rules, we hereby reinstate respondent to the practice of law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

s/ James E. Moore, J.

s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J.

s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.

s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

597 S.E.2d 793, 359 S.C. 142, 2004 S.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-frails-sc-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack