In re Fontanes

Fourth Circuit

In re Fontanes

300 F. App'x 213

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2008·No. No. 08-1943·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Fontanes petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, while we grant Fontanes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Fontanes petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, while we grant Fontanes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Fontanes, 300 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 213 (In re Fontanes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related