In re Fontanes

Fourth Circuit

In re Fontanes

300 F. App'x 213

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 2008

DocketNo. 08-1943

StatusPublished

This text of 300 F. App'x 213 (In re Fontanes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fontanes, 300 F. App'x 213 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Fontanes petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, while we grant Fontanes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Fontanes petitions for an extraordinary writ pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (2000). We find that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, while we grant Fontanes leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 F. App'x 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fontanes-ca4-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack