In re Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fitzgerald

121 A.D. 911, 106 N.Y.S. 1126

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

There has been no defense on the merits interposed to this application. The charges against the respondent, as found by the referee, have been fully established and demonstrate his utter unfitness for office. The referee’s report is confirmed, and the respondent removed from the office of justice of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of. New York for the second division, and the office of attorney and counselor. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There has been no defense on the merits interposed to this application. The charges against the respondent, as found by the referee, have been fully established and demonstrate his utter unfitness for office. The referee’s report is confirmed, and the respondent removed from the office of justice of the Court of Special Sessions of the city of. New York for the second division, and the office of attorney and counselor. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.

In re Fitzgerald, 121 A.D. 911, 106 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

121 A.D. 911 (In re Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.