In re Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fitzgerald

115 A.D. 890

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1906·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in so far as the controversy cannot be affected by the decision which may be made in the appeal pending in the Court of Appeals to-day. In other respects the decision must abide the'determination of that appeal. See Farrell v. Baker and Farrell v. Hackett (ante, p. 890), decided herewith. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and JJ., concurred'. Settle order before the justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, in so far as the controversy cannot be affected by the decision which may be made in the appeal pending in the Court of Appeals to-day. In other respects the decision must abide the'determination of that appeal. See Farrell v. Baker and Farrell v. Hackett (ante, p. 890), decided herewith. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and JJ., concurred'. Settle order before the justice.

In re Fitzgerald, 115 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

115 A.D. 890 (In re Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.