In re Fitzgerald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fitzgerald

115 A.D. 890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D. 890 (In re Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fitzgerald, 115 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, in so far as the controversy cannot be affected by the decision which may be made in the appeal pending in the Court of Appeals to-day. In other respects the decision must abide the'determination of that appeal. See Farrell v. Baker and Farrell v. Hackett (ante, p. 890), decided herewith. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and JJ., concurred'. Settle order before the justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, in so far as the controversy cannot be affected by the decision which may be made in the appeal pending in the Court of Appeals to-day. In other respects the decision must abide the'determination of that appeal. See Farrell v. Baker and Farrell v. Hackett (ante, p. 890), decided herewith. Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Hooker and JJ., concurred'. Settle order before the justice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fitzgerald-nyappdiv-1906.