In re Fitzgerald
89 S.E.2d 462, 242 N.C. 732, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 677
Opinion
It is apparent that the appeal is premature. The question of the custody of the child has not been considered or determined. The order is interlocutory and no substantial right of the appellant has been affected. G.S. 1-271. DeBruhl v. Highway Com., 241 N.C. 616, 86 S.E. 2d 200.
Appeal dismissed.
The foregoing opinion was prepared by DeviN, Emergency Justice, while he was serving in place of Winborne, J., who was absent on account of his physical condition. It is now adopted by the Court and ordered filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Fitzgerald, 89 S.E.2d 462, 242 N.C. 732, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 677 (N.C. 1955).
89 S.E.2d 462 (In re Fitzgerald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fleishel v. Jessup
94 S.E.2d 308 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)