In re Fitzgerald

Supreme Court of North Carolina

In re Fitzgerald

89 S.E.2d 462, 242 N.C. 732, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 677

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 12, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E.2d 462 (In re Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fitzgerald, 89 S.E.2d 462, 242 N.C. 732, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 677 (N.C. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is apparent that the appeal is premature. The question of the custody of the child has not been considered or determined. The order is interlocutory and no substantial right of the appellant has been affected. G.S. 1-271. DeBruhl v. Highway Com., 241 N.C. 616, 86 S.E. 2d 200.

Appeal dismissed.

WiNBORXE and HiggiNS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by DeviN, Emergency Justice, while he was serving in place of Winborne, J., who was absent on account of his physical condition. It is now adopted by the Court and ordered filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI