De Bruhl v. State Highway and Public Works Commission

86 S.E.2d 200, 241 N.C. 616, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 427
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 9, 1955·No. 90·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It appearing upon the face of the record that the order from which appeal is taken is interlocutory, from which appeal does not lie, the appeal will be dismissed, but without prejudice (1) to petitioners’ *617 exception to tbe order, or (2) to tbeir rights in accordance with law and procedure in such cases.

Appeal dismissed.

BakNHill, C. J., and DeviN, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of tbis case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

De Bruhl v. State Highway and Public Works Commission, 86 S.E.2d 200, 241 N.C. 616, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 427 (N.C. 1955).

86 S.E.2d 200 (De Bruhl v. State Highway and Public Works Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lazenby v. Godwin
271 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
State Highway Commission v. Raleigh Farmers Market, Inc.
141 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Green v. WESTERN AND SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
110 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works Commission
102 S.E.2d 229 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
In re Fitzgerald
89 S.E.2d 462 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)