In re Fisher
This text of 67 A.D.2d 312 (In re Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 4, 1956. In this proceeding to discipline him for profes[313]*313sional misconduct, the petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Justice of the Supreme Court to whom the issues were referred for hearing and report.
Charge one alleges that the respondent neglected the prosecution of a medical malpractice action in which he was representing the plaintiff, resulting in a dismissal of the action, and that he failed to advise his client of the true status of the action notwithstanding numerous inquiries.
Charge two alleges that the respondent neglected the prosecution of a personal injury action in which he represented the plaintiff, with the result that the action was barred by the expiration of the Statute of Limitations.
The reporting Justice found that both charges were sustained in their entirety.
After reviewing all of the evidence we are in full accord with the findings of the reporting Justice. Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion to confirm the report is granted. It is the opinion of this court that the respondent should be, and he hereby is, censured for his misconduct.
Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 A.D.2d 312, 415 N.Y.S.2d 252, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fisher-nyappdiv-1979.