In re Estate of Yorke

39 A. 1119, 185 Pa. 61, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 670
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 195·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A careful consideration of the voluminous record in this case [75] has led us all to the conclusion that the orphans’ court in banc was clearly right in sustaining the exception to the order awarding an issue deyisavit vel non, etc., and refusing to grant said issue. It is not our purpose to fortify this conclusion by referring to the testimony or stating the reasons which have satisfied us that neither of the specifications of error should be sustained. To do so, would consume much time to no good purpose.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Estate of Yorke, 39 A. 1119, 185 Pa. 61, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 670 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 1119 (In re Estate of Yorke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Reichel
400 A.2d 1268 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
In Re Estate of Clark
334 A.2d 628 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
In Re Estate of Button
328 A.2d 480 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Paul Will
180 A.2d 254 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1962)
McShain v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
12 A.2d 59 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Pusey's Estate
184 A. 844 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
In Re: Estate of Annie J. Dible
170 A. 440 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Llewellyn's Estate
145 A. 810 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Boone's Estate
6 Pa. D. & C. 263 (Columbia County Orphans' Court, 1924)
Belt's Estate
5 Pa. D. & C. 114 (York County Orphans' Court, 1924)
Phillips' Estate
90 A. 457 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Robinson v. Robinson
53 A. 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Patterson v. Lamb
52 S.W. 98 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1899)