In Re Estate of Solnik

401 So. 2d 896, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20619
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 1981
Docket80-2229
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 401 So. 2d 896 (In Re Estate of Solnik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Estate of Solnik, 401 So. 2d 896, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

401 So.2d 896 (1981)

In re the ESTATE OF Max SOLNIK, Deceased.

No. 80-2229.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 1981.

*897 Murray S. Kaplan of Stierer, Amendola & Kaplan, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Kenneth H. Renick, Lake Worth, for appellee.

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge.

The trial court held, in entering judgment on the pleadings for the decedent's daughter, that the appellant-widow's elective share does not extend under Section 732.206, Florida Statutes (1979),[1] to joint savings accounts with rights of survivorship he established in the names of himself and the daughter pursuant to Section 665.063(1), Florida Statutes (1979). Since this property was plainly not "subject to administration" as provided by Section 732.206, this ruling was entirely correct. See Adams v. Board of Trustees of Internal Improvement Fund, 37 Fla. 266, 20 So. 266, 278 (1896); 31 Am.Jur.2d Executors & Administrators §§ 1, 193 (1967). The widow's contention that her share should be computed on the basis of including such non-probatable assets is belied by the legislature's specific rejection of Sections 2-201 and 2-202 of the Uniform Probate Code, which would have so provided, see Fenn and Koren, The 1974 Florida Probate Code, 27 U. of Fla.L.Rev. 1, 36-37, and is unacceptably contrary to the unambiguous statutory language it eventually chose instead.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur.

NOTES

[1] 732.206 Property entering into computation. — The elective share shall be computed by taking into account all property of the decedent wherever located that is subject to administration except real property not located in Florida.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nahar v. Nahar
656 So. 2d 225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Friedberg v. Sunbank/Miami, NA
648 So. 2d 204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Traub v. Zlatkiss
559 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Sanchez v. Sanchez De Davila
547 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
In Re Estate of Katz
528 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 So. 2d 896, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-solnik-fladistctapp-1981.