Fasano v. Diebold, Inc.

401 So. 2d 896, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20618
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 22, 1981
DocketNo. 80-929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 401 So. 2d 896 (Fasano v. Diebold, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fasano v. Diebold, Inc., 401 So. 2d 896, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20618 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only point raised in this appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the defendant in a personal injury action challenges the trial court’s refusal to permit the plaintiff to call a rebuttal witness. See Reeder v. Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc., 338 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Driscoll v. Morris, 114 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959). We do not address the merits of the contention because we are convinced that the error, if any, was harmless. Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1979).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., GLICKSTEIN, J., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Solnik
401 So. 2d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 So. 2d 896, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fasano-v-diebold-inc-fladistctapp-1981.