In re Estate of Cobb

49 Cal. 599
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1875
DocketNo. 4,211
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 599 (In re Estate of Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Cobb, 49 Cal. 599 (Cal. 1875).

Opinion

By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:

1. The Court proceeded to hear the petition for the probate of the will, without proof of service of notice upon the heirs of the testatrix, in accordance with the requirements of section 1306 of the Code of Civil Procedure—several of the heirs not appearing to the proceeding. This was error.

2. The instrument offered being evidently of a testamentary character, upon application to admit it to probate, the inquiry is only as to the mental condition of the testatrix; whether she was acting under duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence; whether the will was duly executed, and the like. The other questions attempted to be raised by the objections filed in the case concern the construction to be placed upon the will, and cannot be considered until it shall have been admitted to probate.

Order reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings. Remittitur forthwith.

Mr. Justice Crockett did not express an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hazel Hurst Foundation v. Eames
49 Cal. 2d 740 (California Supreme Court, 1958)
Estate of Montgomery
201 P.2d 569 (California Court of Appeal, 1949)
Brown v. Jackson
201 P.2d 569 (California Court of Appeal, 1949)
Estate of Plaut
164 P.2d 765 (California Supreme Court, 1945)
Low v. Low
164 P.2d 765 (California Supreme Court, 1945)
Estate of Dunn
89 P.2d 667 (California Court of Appeal, 1939)
Burnett v. Burnett
44 P.2d 435 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Randall v. Philbrook
170 P. 835 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
In Re Estate of Cook
160 P. 553 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
Bell v. Davis
1916 OK 100 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Stead v. Curtis
205 F. 439 (Ninth Circuit, 1913)
Hobbins Estate v. Tremblay
108 P. 7 (Montana Supreme Court, 1910)
Floto v. Floto
72 N.E. 1092 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1904)
Estate of Fay
78 P. 340 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Thornagel v. Pforr
77 P. 825 (California Supreme Court, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-cobb-cal-1875.