In re Enna D.

30 A.D.3d 518, 816 N.Y.S.2d 368
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 13, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 30 A.D.3d 518 (In re Enna D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Enna D., 30 A.D.3d 518, 816 N.Y.S.2d 368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 to appoint a guardian for the person and property of Enna D., an alleged incapacitated person, Camillus Nicholas appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Leventhal, J.), dated October 15, 2004, as directed him to pay an attorney’s fee in the sum of $5,900 to the attorney for the petitioner.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the award of an attorney’s fee is vacated.

Following the death of the alleged incapacitated person, the guardianship proceeding abated (see Sengstack v Sengstack, 4 NY2d 502, 510 [1958]; Matter of Frank, 283 NY 106; Matter of Posner, 24 AD2d 967, 967 [1965]; Matter of Donovan, 64 Misc 2d 163, 164 [1970]; Matter of Klein, 34 Misc 2d 621, 622-623 [1962]). Thereafter, the Supreme Court lacked the authority to award an attorney’s fee to the attorney retained by the petitioner, as the Mental Hygiene Law does not authorize such [519]*519an award, following the death of the alleged incapacitated person, to attorneys other than those appointed by the court (see Mental Hygiene Law § 81.10 [f]; § 81.16 [f]; Sengstack v Sengstack, supra at 510; Matter of Posner, supra at 967; Matter of Morrison [Wold], 147 Misc 2d 657, 659-661 [1990]; Matter of Donovan, supra at 164; Matter of Klein, supra at 622-623; cf. Matter of Petty, 256 AD2d 281, 283-284 [1998]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Muser (Brook)
2021 NY Slip Op 03913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Henrietta J. (Lisa M.--David J.)
2021 NY Slip Op 03587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
In re the Accounting of Parente
48 Misc. 3d 347 (New York County Courts, 2015)
Matter of Dandridge
120 A.D.3d 1411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
In re Marion C.W.
83 A.D.3d 1087 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 518, 816 N.Y.S.2d 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-enna-d-nyappdiv-2006.