In re Elmira Steel Co.

109 F. 456, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. New York
DecidedApril 17, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 109 F. 456 (In re Elmira Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Elmira Steel Co., 109 F. 456, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205 (N.D.N.Y. 1901).

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

I have given consideration to the questions presented on this motion to confirm the report of the special master, who finds that the Elmira Steel Company should be adjudged' bankrupt. Briefs of counsel for judgment creditors opposed to the adjudication aré ably prepared and arguments learnedly presented. I am of the opinion, however, that the special master has accurately stated the law and has properly applied the present bankruptcy act to the questions presented. When this proceeding was instituted by the filing of the creditors’ petition, the Elmira Steel Company was insolvent. The facts deemed established by the learned master and the inferences deducible therefrom can lead to no other reasonable- conclusion. No other or different conclusion ought to be reached on facts and circumstances such as exist in this case. The question of jurisdiction of this court and the effect upon this proceeding of the proceedings in the Eastern district of Pennsylvania are exhaustively and ably considered by the master. I can add nothing thereto. I concur in his opinion and finding that this court has jurisdiction of this proceeding, that the district court of the Eastern district of Pennsylvania acquired no jurisdiction whatever, and that all proceedings therein, including the adjudication upon the petition and those subsequent thereto, are void. The Elmira Steel Company is accordingly adjudged -bankrupt, and the proper order of reference may be entered; costs and disbursements to be paid out of the estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartl v. Twardy (In re Claxton)
32 B.R. 224 (E.D. Virginia, 1983)
Matter of Claxton
32 B.R. 224 (E.D. Virginia, 1983)
In Re Entertainment Incorporated
375 F. Supp. 390 (E.D. Virginia, 1974)
Kelly v. United States Steel Corp.
284 F.2d 850 (Third Circuit, 1960)
Mattson v. Cuyuna Ore Company
180 F. Supp. 743 (D. Minnesota, 1960)
Ahrens v. Egan
104 N.E.2d 190 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1951)
Jackson v. Lynch
111 F.2d 1003 (Ninth Circuit, 1940)
Travis v. Bixler Vapor Dry Cleaning Co.
66 P.2d 1263 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)
In re Knepper
12 F. Supp. 989 (N.D. New York, 1935)
Hamilton Gas Co. v. Watters
75 F.2d 176 (Fourth Circuit, 1935)
Charlesworth v. Levy Meat Co.
73 F.2d 953 (Eighth Circuit, 1934)
The Fort Orange
5 F. Supp. 833 (S.D. New York, 1933)
Chicago Bank of Commerce v. Carter
61 F.2d 986 (Eighth Circuit, 1932)
In Re Sunset Hill Holding Corp.
52 F.2d 899 (S.D. New York, 1931)
Ellis v. Fiske
60 N.D. 142 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930)
Moore v. Marron Mfg. Co.
1 F.2d 903 (Seventh Circuit, 1924)
In re Pusey & Jones Co.
286 F. 88 (Second Circuit, 1922)
Dryden v. Ranger Refining & Pipe Line Co.
280 F. 257 (Fifth Circuit, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 F. 456, 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elmira-steel-co-nynd-1901.