In re E.C.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

In re E.C.K.

354 S.W.3d 227, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 25, 2011

DocketNo. ED 96293

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 354 S.W.3d 227 (In re E.C.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re E.C.K., 354 S.W.3d 227, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Koons (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to E.C.K. and C.E.G.K. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memo[228]*228randum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Matthew Koons (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to E.C.K. and C.E.G.K. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memo[228]*228randum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 S.W.3d 227, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eck-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack