In re E.C.K.
354 S.W.3d 227, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415
Opinion
ORDER
Matthew Koons (“Father”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to E.C.K. and C.E.G.K. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memo[228] randum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re E.C.K., 354 S.W.3d 227, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
354 S.W.3d 227 (In re E.C.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Eck
354 S.W.3d 227 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)