In re D.K.
This text of 2020 Ohio 3840 (In re D.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as In re D.K., 2020-Ohio-3840.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
FAYETTE COUNTY
IN RE: :
D.K. : CASE NOS. CA2020-02-002 CA2020-02-004 : DECISION : 7/27/2020
:
APPEAL FROM FAYETTE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUVENILE DIVISION Case No. AND20190495
Jess C. Weade, Fayette County Prosecuting Attorney, 110 E. Court St., 1st Floor, Washington, C.H., Ohio 43260, for appellee
Steven H. Eckstein, 1208 Bramble Ave., Washington C.H., Ohio 43160, for appellants
Per Curiam.
{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
appellants, Mother and Father, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript
of proceedings and original papers from the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas,
Juvenile Division, and upon the brief filed by appellants' counsel.
{¶2} Appellants' counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of
the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court Fayette CA2020-02-002 CA2020-02-004
prejudicial to the rights of appellants upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;
(2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87
S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine
whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
appellants' constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
appellants on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of
both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellants.
{¶3} Having allowed appellants sufficient time to respond, and no response having
been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
appellants' rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellants
requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
that it is wholly frivolous.
HENDRICKSON, P.J., S. POWELL and RINGLAND, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 Ohio 3840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-dk-ohioctapp-2020.