In Re: Discipline of Brian Bloomfield
This text of In Re: Discipline of Brian Bloomfield (In Re: Discipline of Brian Bloomfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SCR 111(7) states that "[f]or good cause, the court may set aside its order suspending the attorney from the practice of law." Bloomfield has filed a combined opposition to the State Bar's petition for temporary suspension and a countermotion to set aside the suspension. We conclude that Bloomfield has failed to demonstrate good cause to set aside the mandatory suspension. SCR 111(7); see In re Discipline of Trujillo, 24 P.3d 972, 979 (Utah 2001). We refer this matter to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for the initiation of formal disciplinary proceedings in which the sole issue to be determined is the extent of discipline to be imposed. SCR 111(8). It is so ORDERED.
cc: Jeffrey Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board David A. Clark, Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada William B. Terry, Chartered Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Discipline of Brian Bloomfield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-discipline-of-brian-bloomfield-nev-2014.