In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland

661 N.W.2d 254, 2003 Minn. LEXIS 276, 2003 WL 21202692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland. Read the opinion of the Court — 2002 Minn. LEXIS 681
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 15, 2003·No. C5-02-553·Published

Opinion

ORDER

On October 16, 2002, this court suspended respondent Dylan J. McFarland for 30 days. In re McFarland, 652 N.W.2d 536 (Minn.2002).

Respondent has filed an affidavit for reinstatement in which he states that he has complied with all conditions for reinstatement imposed in the October 16, 2002 order. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an affidavit stating that to the best of the Director’s knowledge, respondent has complied with all conditions of reinstatement, and that the Director does not oppose reinstatement.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Dylan J. McFarland is reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland, 661 N.W.2d 254, 2003 Minn. LEXIS 276, 2003 WL 21202692 (Mich. 2003).

661 N.W.2d 254 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland
652 N.W.2d 536 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2002)