In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland
This text of 661 N.W.2d 254 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On October 16, 2002, this court suspended respondent Dylan J. McFarland for 30 days. In re McFarland, 652 N.W.2d 536 (Minn.2002).
Respondent has filed an affidavit for reinstatement in which he states that he has complied with all conditions for reinstatement imposed in the October 16, 2002 order. The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed an affidavit stating that to the best of the Director’s knowledge, respondent has complied with all conditions of reinstatement, and that the Director does not oppose reinstatement.
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Dylan J. McFarland is reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
661 N.W.2d 254, 2003 Minn. LEXIS 276, 2003 WL 21202692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-mcfarland-minn-2003.