In re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland

652 N.W.2d 536, 2002 Minn. LEXIS 681, 2002 WL 31430458
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 15, 2002
DocketNo. C5-02-553
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 652 N.W.2d 536 (In re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland, 652 N.W.2d 536, 2002 Minn. LEXIS 681, 2002 WL 31430458 (Mich. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Dylan J. McFarland has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely, that respondent misappropriated fees that properly belonged to his law firm in violation of Rule 8.4(e), Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC).

Respondent admits his conduct violated the MRPC, waives his rights pursuant to Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and has entered into a stipulation with the Director in which they jointly recommend (1) that the appropriate discipline is an indefinite suspension from the practice of law under Rule 15(a)(2), RLPR, for a minimum period of 30 days; (2) that the reinstatement hearing provided for in Rule 18(a) through (d), RLPR, be waived; (3) that respondent be required to successfully complete the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination within one year of the date of the court’s order; (4) that respondent be required to comply with Rule 26, RLPR; (5) that respondent pay $900 in costs under Rule 24(a), RLPR; (6) that prior to applying for reinstatement respondent pay over to his former law firm the amount he received from the client to which respondent has no claim, $25,408.44, plus interest, separate and apart from any settlement in the law firm’s action against respondent; and (7) that respondent may be reinstated at any time after 30 days upon the filing of an affidavit with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and the Director’s Office establishing that respondent is current with Continuing Legal Education, has complied with Rules 24 and 26, RLPR, and has satisfactorily completed all other conditions imposed by the court.

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly recommended disposition.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent Dylan J. McFarland is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law for a minimum period of 30 days, subject to the agreed-upon conditions set forth above. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs under Rule 24(a), RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Disciplinary Action Against Hardwick
847 N.W.2d 702 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2014)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against McFarland
661 N.W.2d 254 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 N.W.2d 536, 2002 Minn. LEXIS 681, 2002 WL 31430458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disciplinary-action-against-mcfarland-minn-2002.