In Re Disciplinary Action Against Goldstein

581 N.W.2d 36, 1998 WL 409813
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 14, 1998·No. C1-95-1078·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed petitions alleging that respondent Robert Mark Goldstein has committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline, namely misappropriation of client funds, client neglect, failure to pursue or properly handle client matters, practicing law while suspended and noncooperation with the Director’s investigation of these matters; and

WHEREAS, respondent has failed to answer any of the four petitions filed in this matter and the allegations are thereby deemed admitted, Ruled 13(b), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and

WHEREAS, the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent be disbarred, ,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Robert Mark Goldstein is disbarred. The Director is awarded $900 in costs.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Goldstein, 581 N.W.2d 36, 1998 WL 409813 (Mich. 1998).

581 N.W.2d 36 (In Re Disciplinary Action Against Goldstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Westby
639 N.W.2d 358 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2002)
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Graham
609 N.W.2d 894 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2000)