In re Disbarment of Spitznagel
465 U.S. 1096, 104 S. Ct. 1585, 80 L. Ed. 2d 119, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1426
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Disbarment of Spitznagel. Read the opinion of the Court — 467 U.S. 1237 →
Opinion
It is ordered that Carl S. Spitznagel, Jr., of Tampa, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Disbarment of Spitznagel, 465 U.S. 1096, 104 S. Ct. 1585, 80 L. Ed. 2d 119, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1426 (1984).
465 U.S. 1096 (In re Disbarment of Spitznagel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.