In re Disbarment of Spitznagel
465 U.S. 1096, 104 S. Ct. 1585, 80 L. Ed. 2d 119, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1426
This text of 465 U.S. 1096 (In re Disbarment of Spitznagel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Disbarment of Spitznagel, 465 U.S. 1096, 104 S. Ct. 1585, 80 L. Ed. 2d 119, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1426 (1984).
Opinion
It is ordered that Carl S. Spitznagel, Jr., of Tampa, Fla., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
465 U.S. 1096, 104 S. Ct. 1585, 80 L. Ed. 2d 119, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-spitznagel-scotus-1984.