In re Deseno

55 A.3d 725, 212 N.J. 454, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1240
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Deseno. Read the opinion of the Court — 205 N.J. 91
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 28, 2012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court on the motion for reinstatement to practice filed by THOMAS DeSENO, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, and who has been temporarily suspended from the practice of law since June 11, 2012;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative and actual costs assessed in DRB 08-367 and DRB 10-247;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion is granted, and THOMAS DeSENO is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Deseno, 55 A.3d 725, 212 N.J. 454, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 1240 (N.J. 2012).

55 A.3d 725 (In re Deseno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.