In RE DeSENO

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In RE DeSENO

13 A.3d 357, 205 N.J. 91, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 314

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 9, 2011

DocketD-54 September Term 2010, 067357

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 A.3d 357 (In RE DeSENO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In RE DeSENO, 13 A.3d 357, 205 N.J. 91, 2011 N.J. LEXIS 314 (N.J. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-247, concluding that THOMAS DeSENO of *92 TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a) (lack of candor toward a tribunal), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THOMAS DeSENO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI