In re Desamour

Third Circuit

In re Desamour

132 F. App'x 419

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 27, 2005·No. No. 05-1666·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Reynoldo Desamour has filed a mandamus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651, seeking to compel the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to rule on his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). It appears that the District Court has recently entered an order disposing of his Rule 60 motion. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied as moot. Desamour may, of course, challenge the District Court’s disposition of his Rule 60(b) motion by filing a timely notice of appeal in accordance with the dictates of Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Reynoldo Desamour has filed a mandamus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651, seeking to compel the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to rule on his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b). It appears that the District Court has recently entered an order disposing of his Rule 60 motion. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied as moot. Desamour may, of course, challenge the District Court’s disposition of his Rule 60(b) motion by filing a timely notice of appeal in accordance with the dictates of Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

In re Desamour, 132 F. App'x 419 (3d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

132 F. App'x 419 (In re Desamour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related