In re DermTech Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, S.D. California·Decided June 3, 2026·No. 3:23-cv-01885·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 IN RE DERMTECH INC. SECURITIES Case No.: 23-cv-01885-DMS-JLB LITIGATION 12 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER . AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL 14 PROCEEDINGS 15 16 17 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, requesting 19 an extension of three months. (ECF No. 78). Good cause appearing, the joint motion is 20 GRANTED, and the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 55) is AMENDED as follows: 21 1. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by October 9, 2026. 22 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30–36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 24 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 25 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 26 Civil Procedure. All interrogatories, requests for admission, and document production 27 requests must be served by September 30, 2026. 28 Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all 1 discovery disputes in compliance with Civil Local Rule 26.1.a. The Court expects 2 counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention through the 3 meet and confer process. Discovery disputes must be brought to the Court’s attention in 4 the time and manner required by § V of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. All 5 discovery disputes must be raised within 30 calendar days of the service of an 6 objection, answer, or response that becomes the subject of dispute, or the passage of a 7 discovery due date without response or production, and only after counsel (and any 8 unrepresented parties) have met and conferred to resolve the dispute. See J. Burkhardt Civ. 9 Chambers R. § V. A failure to comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s 10 discovery issue. Absent an order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering 11 this requirement will be recognized by the court. 12 2. Plaintiff’s class certification motion must be filed by November 20, 2026. 13 Counsel for the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the 14 judge who will hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion 15 date and the hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan 16 accordingly. Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion 17 not being heard. 18 3. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by 19 November 24, 2026. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to 20 present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement 21 is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by 22 December 23, 2026. The written designations shall include the name, address and 23 telephone number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is 24 expected to provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for 25 deposition and trial testimony. 26 4. By November 24, 2026, each party shall comply with the disclosure 27 provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This 28 disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide 1 expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving 2 of expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails 3 to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to 4 use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In 5 addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 6 5. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 7 evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by December 23, 2026. 8 6. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by January 22, 2027. 9 The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing 10 fact discovery. 11 7. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 12 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 13 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 14 8. All other pretrial motions must be filed by March 31, 2027. Counsel for the 15 moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will 16 hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the 17 hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure 18 to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 19 Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by the 20 district judge. 21 9. A Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) will be held by video 22 conference1 on March 10, 2027 at 1:45 PM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. 23

24 1 If any party believes the MSC is more likely to be successful if conducted in-person, 25 that party shall meet and confer on the issue with the other parties. After meeting and conferring, and no later than 60 days before the MSC, the parties shall leave a joint 26 voicemail with chambers at (619) 557-6624 indicating which of the parties requests an in- 27 person MSC. In the voicemail, the parties shall leave three mutually available dates for a telephonic status conference to discuss whether the MSC should be held in-person. The 28 1 Mandatory directions for participating in the MSC by video conference are attached 2 hereto. The purpose of the MSC is to permit an informal, candid discussion between the 3 attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to 4 achieve a mediated resolution of the case. All MSC discussions will be off the record, 5 privileged, and confidential. See CivLR 16.3.h. 6 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims adjusters for 7 insured defendants with full and unlimited authority2 to negotiate and enter into a binding 8 settlement, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be present 9 and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the MSC. In the case 10 of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity who is not retained outside counsel 11 must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity to pay an 12 amount up to the amount of the Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damages prayers). 13 The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle the case 14 during the course of the conference without consulting a superior. 15 Counsel for a United States government entity may be excused from this 16 requirement so long as the government attorney who attends the MSC conference (1) has 17 primary responsibility for handling the case, and (2) may negotiate settlement offers which 18 the attorney is willing to recommend to the government official having ultimate settlement 19 authority. 20 21 22 23 2 “Full authority to settle” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement 24 terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 25 648 (7th Cir. 1989).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re DermTech Inc. Securities Litigation, (S.D. Cal. 2026).

In re DermTech Inc. Securities Litigation (In re DermTech Inc. Securities Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)