In Re Davis

372 B.R. 282, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2519, 2007 WL 2172788
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia
DecidedJuly 20, 2007
Docket19-70270
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 372 B.R. 282 (In Re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Davis, 372 B.R. 282, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2519, 2007 WL 2172788 (Va. 2007).

Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER

ROSS W. KRUMM, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the Court is the Debtor’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pau-peris. The Court conducted a hearing on the motion in Roanoke on April 10, 2007. At that time, the Court took the matter under advisement and requested the Debt- or submit a memorandum of authorities in *284 support of her motion. After due consideration of the evidence and authorities, the motion is denied.

FINDINGS OF FACT

On February 22, 2007, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Along with the petition, the Debtor filed a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, which seeks to waive the Chapter 7 filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f). On Schedule I, the Debtor listed no dependents and reported a total gross monthly income of $1,698.06, 1 less payroll deductions of $502.02, resulting in a total net monthly income of $1,196.04. The Debtor reported total monthly expenses of $1,235.00. 2

The Debtor owns no real property. The Debtor owns personal property, which values at $10,451.20 on her Schedule B. The Debtor’s personal property includes one automobile-a 2000 Subaru Outback valued at $5,750. Also, included among the personal property is $300 cash-in-hand and $30 in a personal checking account. The Debtor claims all personal property as exempt.

At the April 10, 2007, hearing, the Debt- or testified that she paid $299.00 to the Southwest Virginia Legal Aid Society, Inc., which it holds in escrow. The Southwest Virginia Legal Aid Society, Inc. requires all potential debtors provide it with the funds to pay any potential bankruptcy filing fee, regardless of whether the Debtor seeks or intends to seek a waiver of their filing fee. In order to make this payment, the Debtor utilized part of her 2006 income tax return, which she properly homesteaded. Based upon this testimony, the court took the Debtor’s motion under advisement, requesting counsel for the Debtor submit authority in support of the motion. According to the authority submitted by the Debtor, the $300 cash on hand listed amongst the Debtor’s personal property and the $299.00 held in escrow by the Southwest Virginia Legal Aid Society, Inc. are one in the same.

LAW AND DISCUSSION

This court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 151, 157, and 1334. This is a case filed under title 11, and the court may hear and determine the outcome of such proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b). Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1409(a).

28 U.S.C. § 1930(f) provides the bankruptcy court the authority to waive the filing fee in an individual debtor’s Chapter 7 petition filed after October 17, 2005. Because the Debtor filed her petition on February 22, 2007, Section 1930(f) applies:

Under the procedures prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States, the district court or the bankruptcy court may waive the filing fee in a case under chapter 7 of title 11 for an individual if the court determines that such individual has income less than 150 percent of the income official poverty line ... applicable to a family of the size involved and is unable to pay that fee in installments.

28 U.S.C. § 1930(f)(1). On August 11, 2005, the Judicial Conference of the Unit *285 ed States promulgated interim procedures to assist in the implementation of this code provision. Judicial Conference of the United States Interim Procedures Regarding the Chapter 7 Fee Waiver Provisions of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, August 11, 2005, available at http://www.uscourts. gov/bankruptcyeourts/jcusguidelines.html [hereinafter Interim Procedures ]. According to the Interim Procedures, the debtor has the burden of showing that the application should be granted. Id. at Section II.A.6.

The Interim Procedures set forth a two step analysis for determining whether the filing fee should be waived. Id at Section II.A.1; In re Lineberry, 344 B.R. 487 (Bankr.W.D.Va.2006). First, a debtor’s income must be less than 150 percent of the poverty guidelines published by the United States Department of Health and Human Services applicable to a family of the size involved. Interim Procedures, Section II. A.l. The “Total Combined Monthly Income” as reported on Line 16 of Schedule I is used for comparison. Interim Procedures, Section II.A.3.

Second, if the debtor’s income is less than 150% of the guidelines, the debt- or must be unable to pay the filing fee in installments. Interim Procedures, Section. II.A.1. In making such a determination, a court need consider the totality of the circumstances. Interim Procedures, Section.II.A.5. Lineberry, 344 B.R. at 492 (citing In re Nuttall, 334 B.R. 921 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.2005)).

I. National Poverty Level

In this case, the Debtor is unmarried with no dependants and thus a family of one for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1930(f). The Debtor’s Schedule I shows a total net monthly income of $1,196.04. In Virginia, 150% of the 2007 DHHS Guideline for a family of one is $1,276.25 per month. The Debtor’s monthly income is $80.21 less than the DHHS Guidelines for a family of one. Therefore, the Debtor satisfies the first prong of the test for waiver of the Chapter 7 fifing fee.

II. Ability to Pay in Installments

In order to grant a debtor’s motion, a court, determining that the debtor’s income is less than 150% of the poverty guidelines, must determine that the debtor is unable to pay the fifing fee in installments. Interim Procedures, Section II. A.3. Although, neither the statute, nor the Interim Procedures provide further guidance, courts have addressed the interpretation of § 1930(f)(1). Lineberry, 344 B.R. at 492 (citing In re Nuttall, 334 B.R. 921). In Nuttall,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Fortman
456 B.R. 370 (N.D. Indiana, 2011)
In Re Frye
440 B.R. 685 (W.D. Virginia, 2010)
In Re Barrick
402 B.R. 39 (M.D. Florida, 2008)
In Re Lephew
380 B.R. 171 (W.D. Virginia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 B.R. 282, 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2519, 2007 WL 2172788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-vawb-2007.