In re Davis
671 A.2d 222
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 543 Pa. 318 →
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 31, 1996·No. Nos. 396 and 795 Disciplinary; Docket No. 2; Nos. 56 DB 82, 78 DB 82, 25 DB 83, 74 DB 87 and 12 DB 88— Disciplinary Board·Published
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 11, 1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
ZAPPALA, J., did not participate in this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Davis, 671 A.2d 222 (Pa. 1996).
671 A.2d 222 (In re Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.