In re Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Davis

671 A.2d 222

DecidedJanuary 31, 1996

DocketNos. 396 and 795 Disciplinary; Docket No. 2; Nos. 56 DB 82, 78 DB 82, 25 DB 83, 74 DB 87 and 12 DB 88— Disciplinary Board

StatusPublished

This text of 671 A.2d 222 (In re Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Davis, 671 A.2d 222 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 11, 1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

ZAPPALA, J., did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 11, 1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

ZAPPALA, J., did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 A.2d 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-davis-pa-1996.