In re Davis
671 A.2d 222, 543 Pa. 318, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 163
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 31, 1996·No. Nos. 396 and 795 Disciplinary Docket No. 2. Nos. 56 DB 82, 78 DB 82, 25 DB 83, 74 DB 87 and 12 DB 88—Disciplinary Board·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated December 11,1995, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted.
[319]*319Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Davis, 671 A.2d 222, 543 Pa. 318, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 163 (Pa. 1996).
671 A.2d 222 (In re Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Quigley
161 A.3d 800 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)