Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/In re David W.

In re David W.

733 A.2d 225, 249 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 25, 1999
DocketSC 16113
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 733 A.2d 225 (In re David W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re David W., 733 A.2d 225, 249 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 204 (Colo. 1999).

Opinion

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 576 (AC 17313/17564), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the trial court required as a matter of law to strike all of the testimony of David Mantell, the court-appointed expert witness?

“2. If the answer to question one is yes, was the error harmful?”

Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Bradford J. Chaucer and William R. Kinloch, in opposition. Decided May 25, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re David W.
759 A.2d 89 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
733 A.2d 225, 249 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-david-w-conn-1999.