In re David W.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

In re David W.

733 A.2d 225, 249 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 204

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 25, 1999·No. SC 16113·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 576 (AC 17313/17564), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the trial court required as a matter of law to strike all of the testimony of David Mantell, the court-appointed expert witness?

“2. If the answer to question one is yes, was the error harmful?”

Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Bradford J. Chaucer and William R. Kinloch, in opposition. Decided May 25, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the commissioner of children and families for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 576 (AC 17313/17564), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, was the trial court required as a matter of law to strike all of the testimony of David Mantell, the court-appointed expert witness?

“2. If the answer to question one is yes, was the error harmful?”

Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Bradford J. Chaucer and William R. Kinloch, in opposition. Decided May 25, 1999

In re David W., 733 A.2d 225, 249 Conn. 907, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 204 (Colo. 1999).

Pincite

733 A.2d 225 (In re David W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related