In Re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation
Opinion
IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT Case No. 21-cv-03825-AMO ANTITRUST LITIGATION SUPERSEDING OMNIBUS ORDER RE: SEALING
Before the Court are the Parties’ and Third-Parties’ Administrative Motions to Seal, Motions to Consider Sealing Third-Party Materials, Statements in Support of Sealing, Declarations in Support of Sealing, and associated exhibits, at ECF 125, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139, 143, 150, 152, 155, 165, 168, 170, 171, 179, 180, 182, 186, 187. The Court, having carefully considered the submissions, the record, the applicable law, and any arguments related thereto, hereby orders that the Administrative Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court entered an earlier version of this Order that did not fully address all of the pending administrative motions to seal. This Order incorporates and SUPERSEDES the Court’s Omnibus Order Regarding Sealing dated April 1, 2024. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to sealing is not sufficient.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1). The request must be “narrowly tailored to seal only the A party seeking to seal records must provide “compelling reasons” to overcome the “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006); see Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016). The standard derives from the “common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). To overcome this strong presumption, the party seeking to seal judicial records must “articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings . . . that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial process.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (citations omitted). The party must make a “particularized showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002). It is in the “sound discretion of the trial court” to determine what constitutes a “compelling reason” for sealing a court document. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)). Compelling reasons justifying sealing court records generally exist when such “court files might . . . become a vehicle for improper purposes” such as “releas[ing] trade secrets,” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179, or “as sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing,” Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097; see In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) (sealing trade secret information about “the pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed minimum payment terms” in the parties’ licensing agreement). Records attached to nondispositive motions must meet the lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as such records “are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80 (quotations omitted). The Court finds that compelling reasons exist to support the filing under seal of the seal these documents or portions thereof where they appear on the public docket. The Court denies the request to seal any documents or portions thereof (1) listed as “denied” in the following chart or (2) provisionally filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f) because a Party or Third- Party had designated them as confidential or highly confidential under the protective order but that were not included in the below chart because no Party or Third-Party filed a statement or declaration seeking to maintain them under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f). The Court appreciates the efforts of counsel to prepare the chart below, including citations to the relevant docket entries. The Court notes that, while it grants sealing many of the documents presented at this stage, it will be disinclined to permit sealing of materials presented in a public trial. Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-2; 125-3 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit A - Bass Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Seal, ¶ 5 information. Einer Elhauge, Exhibit 1 (Expert Report of Einer ECF No. 125 Elhauge) Administrative • Page 14, redacted Motion to File Under fn. 55 Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 28, Figure 6 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 DENIED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Descriptions of Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to surgical maneuvers the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 are not proprietary. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 36, Figure 9 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 DENIED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Descriptions of Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to surgical maneuvers the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 are not proprietary. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 37, Figure 10 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 84, Figure 20 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 88, Figure 21 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 89, redacted Administrative portions of ¶ 174 Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT Case No. 21-cv-03825-AMO ANTITRUST LITIGATION SUPERSEDING OMNIBUS ORDER RE: SEALING
Before the Court are the Parties’ and Third-Parties’ Administrative Motions to Seal, Motions to Consider Sealing Third-Party Materials, Statements in Support of Sealing, Declarations in Support of Sealing, and associated exhibits, at ECF 125, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139, 143, 150, 152, 155, 165, 168, 170, 171, 179, 180, 182, 186, 187. The Court, having carefully considered the submissions, the record, the applicable law, and any arguments related thereto, hereby orders that the Administrative Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court entered an earlier version of this Order that did not fully address all of the pending administrative motions to seal. This Order incorporates and SUPERSEDES the Court’s Omnibus Order Regarding Sealing dated April 1, 2024. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to sealing is not sufficient.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1). The request must be “narrowly tailored to seal only the A party seeking to seal records must provide “compelling reasons” to overcome the “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006); see Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016). The standard derives from the “common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). To overcome this strong presumption, the party seeking to seal judicial records must “articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings . . . that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial process.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (citations omitted). The party must make a “particularized showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002). It is in the “sound discretion of the trial court” to determine what constitutes a “compelling reason” for sealing a court document. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097 (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)). Compelling reasons justifying sealing court records generally exist when such “court files might . . . become a vehicle for improper purposes” such as “releas[ing] trade secrets,” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179, or “as sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing,” Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097; see In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) (sealing trade secret information about “the pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed minimum payment terms” in the parties’ licensing agreement). Records attached to nondispositive motions must meet the lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as such records “are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80 (quotations omitted). The Court finds that compelling reasons exist to support the filing under seal of the seal these documents or portions thereof where they appear on the public docket. The Court denies the request to seal any documents or portions thereof (1) listed as “denied” in the following chart or (2) provisionally filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f) because a Party or Third- Party had designated them as confidential or highly confidential under the protective order but that were not included in the below chart because no Party or Third-Party filed a statement or declaration seeking to maintain them under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f). The Court appreciates the efforts of counsel to prepare the chart below, including citations to the relevant docket entries. The Court notes that, while it grants sealing many of the documents presented at this stage, it will be disinclined to permit sealing of materials presented in a public trial. Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-2; 125-3 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit A - Bass Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Seal, ¶ 5 information. Einer Elhauge, Exhibit 1 (Expert Report of Einer ECF No. 125 Elhauge) Administrative • Page 14, redacted Motion to File Under fn. 55 Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 28, Figure 6 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 DENIED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Descriptions of Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to surgical maneuvers the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 are not proprietary. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 36, Figure 9 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 DENIED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Descriptions of Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to surgical maneuvers the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 are not proprietary. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 37, Figure 10 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 84, Figure 20 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 88, Figure 21 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 89, redacted Administrative portions of ¶ 174 Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-5 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit C - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 9 (Howe 1/18/23 SIS Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 29, Figure 6 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-5 ECF No. 125-1 DENIED. Exhibit C - Chaput Wong Declaration in Descriptions of Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to surgical maneuvers the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 are not proprietary. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 9 (Howe 1/18/23 SIS Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 37, Figure 9 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 125-5 ECF No. 125-1 DENIED. Exhibit C - Chaput Wong Declaration in Descriptions of Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to surgical maneuvers the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 are not proprietary. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 9 (Howe 1/18/23 SIS Rpt) ECF No. 125 • Page 38, Figure 10 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3
Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-6 ECF No. 125-1 Page 28, Figure 6 Exhibit D - Lannin Wong Declaration in GRANTED. Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to Proprietary the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 business Eugene Rubach, Ex. 4 information. (Excerpts from (Howe ECF No. 125 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) Administrative Page 37, Figure 9 • Page 28, Figure 6 Motion to File Under Page 38, Figure 10 • Page 36, Figure 9 Seal Materials from DENIED. Descriptions of • Page 37, Figure 10 Daubert Motions, pg. surgical maneuvers 1-3 are not proprietary.
ECF No. 143-2; 143-15 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs’ Declaration of Dr. Proprietary Administrative Motion to Jaime Wong in business Consider Support of Defendant information. • Page 14, redacted Intuitive Surgical’s fn. 55 Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motions to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed (“Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing”), ¶ 4 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3
Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-3; 143-17 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 12 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00067540 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business 00067547), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information. Administrative Motion to ¶ 6 Consider • Page Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00067547, redacted portion Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4-5
ECF No. 143-4; 143-17 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 42 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00029174), Plaintiffs’ Support of Statement business Administrative Motion to to Consider Sealing, information. Consider ¶ 4 • Page Intuitive- 00029174, redacted ECF No. 143 portions. Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-5; 143-19 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 44 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00552697 – Intuitive- Support of Statement product 00552715), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, development Administrative Motion to ¶ 5 information. Consider • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00552706 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 00552715, redacted in Support of portions Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4
ECF No. 143-6; 143-20 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 48 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 01235518 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business 01235542), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information. Administrative Motion to ¶ 6 Consider • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 01235528 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 01235533, redacted in Support of portions. Plaintiffs’ • Pages Intuitive- Administrative 01235535 – Intuitive- Motion to Consider 01235542, redacted Whether Another portions. Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4-5 ECF No. 143-7; 143-21 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 68 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00560277 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business 00560390), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information and Administrative Motion to ¶¶ 4, 6 non-public Consider financial Pages containing redacted ECF No. 143 information. information: Intuitive’s Statement • Intuitive-00560281 in Support of • Intuitive-00560282 Plaintiffs’ • Intuitive-00560291 Administrative • Intuitive-00560292 Motion to Consider • Intuitive-00560293 Whether Another Party’s Materials • Intuitive-00560294 Should be Sealed, pg. • Intuitive-00560295 1-5 • Intuitive-00560296 • Intuitive-00560297 • Intuitive-00560298 • Intuitive-00560299 • Intuitive-00560300 • Intuitive-00560301 • Intuitive-00560302 • Intuitive-00560303 • Intuitive-00560304 • Intuitive-00560305 • Intuitive-00560306 • Intuitive-00560307 • Intuitive-00560308 • Intuitive-00560309 • Intuitive-00560310 • Intuitive-00560311 • Intuitive-00560312 • Intuitive-00560313 • Intuitive-00560314 • Intuitive-00560315 • Intuitive-00560316 • Intuitive-00560317 • Intuitive-00560318 • Intuitive-00560320 • Intuitive-00560321 • Intuitive-00560322 • Intuitive-00560323 • Intuitive-00560324 • Intuitive-00560325 • Intuitive-00560326 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 • Intuitive-00560330 – Intuitive-00560332 • Intuitive-00560335 – Intuitive-00560338 • Intuitive-00560343 – Intuitive-00560344 • Intuitive-00560346 • Intuitive-00560350 – Intuitive-00560351 • Intuitive-00560356 • Intuitive-00560358 – Intuitive-00560362 • Intuitive-00560365 – Intuitive-00560369 • Intuitive-00560371 – Intuitive-00560378 • Intuitive-00560386 – Intuitive-00560387 • Intuitive-00560389 – Intuitive-00560390 ECF No. 143-8; 143-22 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 69 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00366044 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business 00366053), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information. Administrative Motion to ¶ 4 Consider • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00366046 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 00366047, redacted in Support of portions. Plaintiffs’ • Pages Intuitive- Administrative 00366051 – Intuitive- Motion to Consider 00366052, redacted Whether Another portions. Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-9; 143-23 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 73 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00519980 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business 00520005), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information. Administrative Motion to ¶ 4 Consider • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00520001 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 00520002, redacted in Support of portions. Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 143-10; 143-24 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 76 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Non-public 00203904 – Intuitive- Support of Statement financial 00203906), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information. Administrative Motion to ¶ 6 Consider • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00203904 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 00203905, redacted in Support of portions Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4-5 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-11; 143-25 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 90 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00552716 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business and 00552727), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, product Administrative Motion to ¶ 5 development Consider information. • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00552723 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 00552727, redacted in Support of portions. Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4
ECF No. 143-12; 143-26 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 93 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 02038766 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business 02038770), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, information. Administrative Motion to ¶¶ 4, 5 Consider • Page Intuitive- ECF No. 143 02038767, redacted Intuitive’s Statement portions. in Support of • Page Intuitive- Plaintiffs’ 02038768, redacted Administrative portions. Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-13; 143-27 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 96 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 00552728 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business and 00552743), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, product Administrative Motion to ¶ 5 development Consider information. • Pages Intuitive- ECF No. 143 00552735 – Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 00552741 and Intuitive- in Support of 00552743, redacted Plaintiffs’ portions. Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4
ECF No. 143-14; 143-28 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 97 (Intuitive- Wong Declaration in Proprietary 01265649 – Intuitive- Support of Statement business and non- 01265809), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, public financial Administrative Motion to ¶ 6 information. Consider ECF No. 143 Pages containing redacted Intuitive’s Statement information: in Support of • Intuitive-01265652 Plaintiffs’ – Intuitive-01265655 Administrative • Intuitive-01265657 Motion to Consider – Intuitive-01265675 Whether Another • Intuitive-01265677 Party’s Materials – Intuitive-01265740 Should be Sealed, pg. • Intuitive-01265742 2-3, 5-6 – Intuitive-01265756 • Intuitive-01265759 – Intuitive-01265774 • Intuitive-01265776 – Intuitive-01265779 • Intuitive-01265781 – Intuitive-01265787 • Intuitive-01265789 • Intuitive-01265792 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 • • Intuitive- 01265794 – Intuitive- 01265809 ECF No. 152-2 ECF No. 152-1 Page 28, Figure 6 Declaration of Kathryn E. Declaration of Dr. GRANTED. Cahoy in Support of Jaime Wong in Proprietary Intuitive’s Opposition to Support of Intuitive business Plaintiffs’ Motion for Surgical’s information. Summary Judgment and Administrative Cross-Motion for Summary Motions to Seal Page 37, Figure 9 Judgment Ex. 3 (Howe Materials From Its Page 38, Figure 10 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) Summary Judgment DENIED. • Page 28, Figure 6 Briefs, ¶ 6 Descriptions of surgical maneuvers • Page 36, Figure 9 • Page 37, Figure 10 ECF No. 152 a re not proprietary. • Page 84, Figure 20 Intuitive’s Page 84, Figure 20 • Page 88, Figure 21 Administrative Page 88, Figure 21 • Page 89, redacted Motion to Seal Page 89, redacted Materials From its portions of ¶ 174 portions of ¶ 174 Opposition to GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment Proprietary business and and Cross Motion for product Summary Judgment, development pg. 1-2 information.
Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 168-2 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. Bateman Ex. 8 ISO Declaration of Dr. Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Jaime Wong in business Intuitive’s Motion to Support of Intuitive information. Exclude Testimony of Einer Surgical, Inc.’s Elhauge - Deposition of Statement in Support Nickola “Nicky” Goodson of Plaintiffs’ April 20, (October 27, 2022) 2023 Administrative • Pages 183-184, Motions to Consider redacted portions. Whether Another Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed (“Wong Dec.”), ¶ 4
ECF No. 168 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-2; 125-3 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. Bateman Ex. 1 ISO Wong Decl. ¶ 4 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Testimony of Einer Intuitive’s Statement Elhauge - Corrected Expert in Support of Report of Professor Einer Plaintiffs’ April 20, Elhauge (January 10, 2023) 2023 Administrative • Page 14, redacted Motion to Consider fn. 55 Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 (See Dkt. 125-2; Dkt. 125-7 at 1.) Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-12; 143-26 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. McCuaig Ex. 15 ISO of Wong Decl. ¶ 4 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Kimberly Intuitive’s Statement Trautman’s Testimony - in Support of Intuitive-02038766 Plaintiffs’ April 20, • Pages Intuitive- 2023 Administrative 02038767–68, redacted Motion to Consider portions. Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3
(See Dkt. 143-26; Dkt. 143-29 at 4–5) ECF No. 143-11; 143-25 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. Spector Ex. 8 ISO Wong Decl. ¶ 5 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business and Defendant’s Motion to ECF No. 168 product Exclude Testimony of Dr. Intuitive’s Statement development Eugene Rubach - Intuitive- in Support of information. 00552716 – Intuitive- Plaintiffs’ April 20, 00552727, NFJ for IS4000 2023 Administrative 8mm Needle Drivers Motion to Consider • Pages Intuitive- Whether Another 00552723 – Intuitive- Party’s Materials 00552727, redacted Should be Sealed, pg. portions. 1-4
(See Dkt. 143-25; Dkt. 143-29 at 4) Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 168-3 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. McCuaig Ex. 12 ISO of Wong Decl. ¶ 5 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Kimberly Intuitive’s Statement Trautman’s Testimony - in Support of Intuitive-00493612 Plaintiffs’ April 20, • Page Intuitive- 2023 Administrative 00493619, redacted Motion to Consider portions. Whether Another • Page Intuitive- Party’s Materials 00493623, redacted portion. Should be Sealed, pg. • Page Intuitive- 1-4 00493625, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive- 00493630, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive- 00493633, redacted portions. ECF No. 143-3; 143-17 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. McCuaig Ex. 9 ISO of Wong Decl. ¶ 6 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Kimberly Intuitive’s Statement Trautman’s Testimony - in Support of Intuitive-00067540 -SLSA Plaintiffs’ April 20, • Page Intuitive- 2023 Administrative 00067547, redacted portion Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4 (See Dkt. 143-17; Dkt. 143-29 at 1) Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 180-2 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Ex. 102 Declaration of Dr. Proprietary (Intuitive- Jaime Wong in business and 02056740-Intuitive- Support of Intuitive product 02056761) Surgical, Inc.’s development Statement in Support information. Pages containing redacted of information: Plaintiffs’ May 4, • Intuitive-02057644- 2023 Intuitive-02057646 Administrative • Intuitive-02057649 Motions to • Intuitive-02057651 Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed (“Wong Dec.”), Wong Dec. ¶ 6. ECF No. 180 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 ECF No. 180-3 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Ex. 123 Wong Dec. ¶ 6 Proprietary (Intuitive- business and 00493612-Intuitive- ECF No. 180 product 00493670) Intuitive’s Statement development in Support of information. Pages containing redacted Plaintiffs’ May 4, information: 2023 Administrative • Intuitive-00493619 Motion to Consider • Intuitive-00493623 Whether Another • Intuitive-00493625 Party’s Materials • Intuitive-00493630 Should be Sealed, pg. • Intuitive-00493633 1-4 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 180-4 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Exhibit 130 Wong Dec. ¶ 7 Non-public – Restore Settlement financial (Intuitive- ECF No. 180 information. 02072151 –Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 02072157) in Support of • Page Intuitive- Plaintiffs’ May 4, 02072153, redacted 2023 Administrative portions Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3, 4
ECF No. 180-5 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Exhibit 131 Wong Dec. ¶ 7 Non-public – Rebotix Settlement financial (Intuitive- ECF No. 180 information. 02070399 –Intuitive- Intuitive’s Statement 02070405) in Support of • Pages Intuitive- Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2070401- Intuitive- 2023 Administrative 02070402, redacted Motion to Consider portions Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3, 4
ECF No. 180-6 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Exhibit 146 Wong Dec. ¶ 5 Proprietary (Intuitive-00786911 – business Intuitive- ECF No. 180 information. 00786951) Intuitive’s Statement • Page Intuitive- in Support of 00786914, redacted Plaintiffs’ May 4, portions. 2023 Administrative • Page Intuitive- Motion to Consider 00786919, redacted Whether Another portions. Party’s Materials • Page Intuitive- Should be Sealed, pg. 00786945, redacted 1-3 portions. Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 180-7 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Exhibit 147 Wong Dec. ¶ 5 Proprietary (Intuitive-00785382 – business Intuitive- ECF No. 180 information. 00785422) Intuitive’s Statement • Page Intuitive- in Support of 00785417 Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3
ECF No. 186-2 ECF No. 186-1 GRANTED. Cahoy Supp. Declaration Declaration of Dr. Cybersecurity Ex. 90 Jaime Wong in development (Intuitive-00506505 Support of Intuitive content. excerpts) Surgical, Inc.’s • Pages Intuitive- Administrative 0506539–42, redacted Motion portions to Seal Materials from • Pages Intuitive- its Summary 0506593–94, redacted Judgment portions Reply (“Wong Dec.”), Wong Dec. ¶ 4. ECF No. 186 Intuitive’s Administrative Motion to Seal Materials From its Summary Judgment Reply, pg. 1-2
Documents or Portions Thereof that Stryker Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed ECF 170-28 ECF No. 179, pg. 1-8 GRANTED. Proprietary Spector Dec. Ex. 139 ECF No. 179-1, 179- business (STRREB00000259- 2 information. STRREB00000273)
Documents or Portions Thereof that Alliance Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed ECF No. 139-28 ECF No. 146 GRANTED. Proprietary Exhibit 15, Motion to business and Exclude Testimony of product Trautman development AHP000527 information. ECF No. 155-29 ECF No. 157 GRANTED. Proprietary Intuitive Cross Motion for business and Summary Judgment product Cahoy Dec. Ex. 41 development AHP000527 information. ECF No. 170-16, 165-9 ECF No. 167 GRANTED. Proprietary Rebuttal Expert Report of business and Dr. T. Kim Parnell product March 1, 2023 development Appendix B: information. AHP000527 ECF No. 139-21 ECF No. 146 GRANTED. Foreman 01/18/2023 Berhold Dec. ¶¶ 3-7 Proprietary Report business and ¶¶ 117-26, 139-40 product development information. ECF No. 139-28 ECF No. 146 GRANTED. Motion to Exclude Berhold Dec. ¶¶ 3-7 Proprietary Testimony of Kimberly A. business and Trautman Ex. 15 at Page 10 product development information. Documents or Portions Thereof that Alliance Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed ECF No. 155-2 ECF No. 157 GRANTED. Intuitive Cross Motion for Berhold Dec. ¶¶ 3-7 Proprietary Summary Judgment business and Page 9 product development information. Documents or Portions Thereof that Rebotix Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed ECF 139-7 ECF No. 142 GRANTED. Expert Report of Robert Proprietary Howe (01/18/2023) business and product Pages 24-26, ¶¶ 47-49 development information. ECF 129-1 ECF No. 142 GRANTED. Exhibit 18 Proprietary (REBOTIX174692 - business and Historical timeline for product initial R&D of Benjamin development Biomedical and Rebotix) to information. the Declaration of J. Corrigan in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion
Portions of page 1
ECF 129-5 ECF No. 142 GRANTED. Exhibit 80 Proprietary (REBOTIX110980) to the business and Declaration of J. Corrigan product in Support of Plaintiffs’ development Motion information. Pages 1-2 Documents or Portions Thereof that Rebotix Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed ECF 153; 155-2 ECF No. 159 GRANTED. Opposition of Defendant Proprietary Intuitive Surgical, Inc. To business and Plaintiffs’ Motion for product Summary Judgment and development Cross-Motion for Summary information. Judgment (In re Da Vinci) Page 6
ECF 153-7; 155-56 ECF No. 159 GRANTED. Ex. 1 to Smith Declaration Proprietary (Smith Amended Rebuttal business and Report in In re: da Vinci product Surgical Robot Antitrust development Litigation) information.
Page 37
ECF 153-21; 155-8 ECF No. 159 GRANTED. Cahoy Dec. Ex. 14 Proprietary (REBOTIX100995 - business and REBOTIX101019) product development Entire Document information.
ECF 153-22; 155-9 ECF No. 159 GRANTED. Cahoy Dec. Ex. 15 Proprietary (REBOTIX162404 - business and REBOTIX162424) product development Entire Document information.
Documents or Portions Thereof that Restore Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Evidence Offered in Objections Ruling Portion of Document Support of Sealing Sought to be Sealed Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Foreman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 44 and product ¶¶ 133-34 development Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 DENIED. Text of Foreman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 selected paragraph Report (SIS) at 44 does not contain ¶ 135 confidential text only (not information, nor does footnote) it include a footnote. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 DENIED. Text of Foreman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 selected paragraph Report (SIS) at 45 does not contain ¶ 136 confidential information. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Foreman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 57 and product ¶ 174 development information. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Foreman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 70 and agency ¶ 223 communications. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 DENIED. Text of Foreman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 selected paragraph Report (SIS) at 71 does not contain ¶ 224 confidential information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 8 ¶ 19 and product development information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 23-24 and product ¶ 46 development information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 24 and product ¶ 47 development information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 43 and product ¶ 75 development information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 66 and product ¶ 125 development information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at 66 and product ¶ 127 development information. Dkt. No. 139-8 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (SIS) at and product ¶¶ 143-45, 147-50, development 152-55, 158 information.
Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 5 and product ¶ 12 redact n.9 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 22- and product 23 ¶ 48 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 23 and product ¶ 49 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 42 and product ¶¶ 78-79 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 66 and product ¶ 128 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 71 (8:20-8:21) information and ¶ 142 redact agency parenthetical in Dkt. No. 146 communication. footnote Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 72 and product ¶ 145 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 72 and product ¶ 146 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 72- and product 73 ¶ 147 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 73- and product 74 ¶ 149 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 75 and product ¶¶ 150-52 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 77 and product ¶¶ 155-57 development information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Report (Larkin) at 95 and product ¶ 183 development redact text only information. Dkt. No. 139-7 Dkt. No. 145 DENIED. Designated Howe 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 text does not contain Report (Larkin) at 95 confidential ¶ 184 information. redact first sentence in footnote only Dkt. No. 139-2 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Parnell 03/01/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Rebuttal Report and product (Larkin) at 131 development ¶¶ 292-93 information. Dkt. No. 139-3 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Parnell 03/01/2023 Proprietary business Rebuttal Report (SIS) Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 and product at 111-12 ¶ 264 development information. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Trautman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Reply Report information and (Foreman) at 39 Dkt. No. 146 agency ¶¶ 117-26, 129, 131- Berhold Dec. ¶¶ 3-7 communications. 34, 137, 139 Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Trautman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Reply Report information and (Foreman) at 47 ¶ Dkt. No. 146 agency 140, first sentence Berhold Dec. ¶¶ 3-7 communications. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Trautman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Reply Report and product (Foreman) at 56-57 ¶ development 172 information.
Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 DENIED as to text in Trautman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 ¶ 203; GRANTED as Reply Report to footnote 151, (Foreman) at 64 ¶ 203 proprietary business and product development information. Dkt. No. 139-21 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Trautman 01/18/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Reply Report information and (Foreman) at 69 agency ¶¶ 220-21, 233 communications. Dkt. No. 139-29 Dkt. No. 145 DENIED. Designated Trautman 03/01/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 text does not contain Rebuttal Report at 15 confidential ¶ 30 information. Dkt. No. 139-16 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Smith 01/20/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Rebuttal Report at 43 and product ¶ 53 development information. Dkt. No. 139-16 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Smith 01/20/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Rebuttal Report at 43 and product ¶ 55 n.149 development information. Dkt. No. 139-16 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Smith 01/20/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Rebuttal Report at and product 140 n.491 development information. Dkt. No. 139-16 Dkt. No. 145 GRANTED. Smith 01/20/2023 Parker Dec. ¶¶ 3-5 Proprietary business Rebuttal Report at and product 175 ¶ 248 n.639 development information. Dkt. No. 150-1 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in Restore) and product Dep. at 145:16-24 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00094918- and product 956 at 928, 930 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00055935 and product development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00055937 and product development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00055938 and product development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in Restore) and product Dep. at 204:16-206:2 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2, 165- Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. 3 Proprietary business and product Restore-00094938- development 956 at 953-955 information.
Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in Restore) and product Dep. at 132:7 – development 142:12 information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00055937 and product development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in Restore) and product Dep. at 53:21-56:2 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Parker (in Restore) Proprietary business Dep. at 115:24-116:9 and product development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in Restore) and product Dep. at 119:19- development 120:30 information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00009348- and product 359 at 355 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00002260- and product 265 at 262 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business May (in Restore) and product Dep. at 100:12-102:3 development Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business May (in Restore) and product Dep. at 100:12-102:3 development information. Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business May (in re: da Vinci) and product Dep. at 100:12-102:3 development information. Dkt. No. 128-3 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Clif Parker 5/4/2021 and product 30(b)(6) Dep. development (Restore) at 172:2-15 information.
Dkt. No. 128-3, 165- Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. 4 Proprietary business and product Vautrot 5/22/2021 development Dep. (Restore), Ex. 4 information. at Restore-00039124
Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. 3 Proprietary business and product May (in In re: da development Vinci) Dep. at 75:16- information. 76:1 Dkt. No. 128-3 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Ferreira (in In re: da and product Vinci) Dep. at development 113:13-20 information. Dkt. No. 128-3 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in In re: da and product Vinci) Dep. at 30:24- development 31:2 information.
Dkt. No. 128-3 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in In re: da and product Vinci) Dep. at development 141:14-21 information.
Dkt. No. 150-1, 170- Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. 27 Proprietary business and product Parker (in In re: da development Vinci) Dep. at 139:1- information. 140:08; 141:23- 142:12
Dkt. No. 128-3 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business May (in In re: da and product Vinci) Dep. at 97:5-8 development information. Dkt. No. 128-3 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Parker (in Restore) and product Dep. at 145:16-24 development information. Dkt. No. 165-14 Dkt. No. 144 GRANTED. Proprietary business Restore-00112674 at - and product 683 development information. Dkt. No. 150-1 Dkt. No. 156 GRANTED. Proprietary business Plaintiff’s Motion for and product Summary Judgment, development Declaration of J. information. Corrigan, Exhibit 79
Page 139:1-139:12
Dkt. No. 150-1 Dkt. No. 156 GRANTED. Proprietary business Exhibit 79 and product development Page 139:13-140:4 information. Dkt. No. 153-7 Dkt No. 158 GRANTED only as to Smith Amended the numbers. Rebuttal Report Proprietary business and product Pages 41-42 development information. Dkt. No. 153-7 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED only as to Smith Amended customer names. Rebuttal Report Proprietary business and product Page 42 development information. Dkt. No. 153-7 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED only as to Smith Amended vendor identities and Rebuttal Report cost figures represented in Page 43 numbers. Proprietary business and product development information. Dkt. No. 153-7 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED only as to Smith Amended customer names. Rebuttal Report Proprietary business and product Page 45 development information. Dkt. No. 153-7 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED only as to Smith Amended vendor identities. Rebuttal Report Proprietary business and product Page 140 development information. Dkt. No. 155-27 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED. Deposition of Clifton Proprietary business Parker (May 4, 2021) and product development Pages 204-205 information.
Dkt. No. 155-27 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED. Deposition of Clifton Proprietary business Parker (May 4, 2021) and product development Pages 213-216 information. Dkt. No. 155-54 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED. Deposition of Clifton Proprietary business Parker (October 25, and product 2022) development information. Pages 31-32 Dkt. No. 155-55 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED. Deposition of Kevin Proprietary business May (November 3, and product 2022 development information. Page 60 Dkt. No. 155-26 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED. Cahoy Dec. Ex. 38 Proprietary business Restore-00001248 - information and Restore-00001256 agency Attached as Ex. 1. communications. Dkt. No. 155-30 Dkt. No. 158 GRANTED. Cahoy Dec. Ex. 42 Proprietary business information and Restore-00086093 - agency Restore-00086120 communications. Attached as Ex. 2. Dkt. No. 170-16, Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 165-9 text does not contain confidential Multiple Cites: information. AHP000527
Dkt. No. 128-44, Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 170-21 Proprietary business information and Foreman 01/18/2023 agency Reply Report communications. Page 43 ¶ 131-132 Restore-00086093, at -6096-6100.
Dkt. No. 128-44, Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 170-21 Proprietary business information and Foreman 01/18/2023 agency Reply Report communications.
Page 44 ¶ 133-134 Dkt. No. 128-44 Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. Proprietary business and product Foreman 01/18/2023 development Reply Report information.
Page 56-57 ¶ 172 Restore-00089490, at -9495, -9498 Dkt. No. 128-44 Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. Proprietary business Foreman 01/18/2023 information and Reply Report agency communications. Page 69 ¶ 220-221 Restore-00001248, at -1256. Dkt. No. 128-44 Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. Proprietary business Foreman 01/18/2023 information and Reply Report agency communications. Page 69 ¶ 220-221 Restore-00001248, at -1254
Dkt. No. 165-14 Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. Proprietary business Trautman 03/01/2023 information and Rebuttal Report agency communications. Page 15 ¶ 30 Restore-00112674, at -683 Ferreira Dep. (Nov. 10, 2022) Tr. at 193:16- 195:13.
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 2 Proprietary business information. Corrected Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 114 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 145:16-24 Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 2 Proprietary business information. Corrected Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 114 Restore-00094918- 956 at 928, 930 Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 364 Restore-00055935
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023 Footnote 364 Restore-00055937
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 364 Restore-00055938
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023 Footnote 443 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 204:16-206:2
Dkt. No. 128-2, 165- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023 Footnote 444 Restore-00094938- 956 at 953-955
Dkt. No. 128-2 Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated text does not contain Corrected Expert confidential Report of Professor information. Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 445 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 132:7 – 142:12 Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 503 Restore-00055937
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023 Footnote 547 Restore-00055937
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 2 Proprietary business information. Corrected Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 616 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 53:21-56:2
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information, as it Report of Professor vague and Einer generalized. Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 627 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 115:24-116:9
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 2 Proprietary business plans. Corrected Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023
Footnote 645 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 119:19- 120:30
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023 Footnote 840 Restore-00009348- 359 at 355
Dkt. No. 165-3, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 2 text does not contain confidential Corrected Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 1/10/2023 Footnote 876 Restore-00002260- 265 at 262 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 3 Proprietary business plans. Rebuttal Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 722 May (in Restore) Dep. at 100:12-102:3 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 723 May (in Restore) Dep. at 100:12-102:3 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 724 May (in re: da Vinci) Dep. at 100:12-102:3 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023 Footnote 725 Clif Parker 5/4/2021 30(b)(6) Dep. (Restore) at 172:2-15
Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 725 Vautrot 5/22/2021 Dep. (Restore), Ex. 4 at Restore-00039124 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 810 May (in In re: da Vinci) Dep. at 75:16- 76:1
Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 839 Ferreira (in In re: da Vinci) Dep. at 113:13-20 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 841 Parker (in In re: da Vinci) Dep. at 30:24- 31:2
Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023 Footnote 842 Parker (in In re: da Vinci) Dep. at 141:14-21 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 843 Parker (in In re: da Vinci) Dep. at 139:23-140:08; 141:23-142:12 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 GRANTED. 3 Proprietary business plans. Rebuttal Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 844 May (in In re: da Vinci) Dep. at 97:5-8 Dkt. No. 165-4, 128- Dkt No. 166 DENIED. Designated 3 text does not contain confidential Rebuttal Expert information. Report of Professor Einer Elhauge, 3/3/2023
Footnote 897 Parker (in Restore) Dep. at 145:16-24 Dkt. No. 170-1 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Hospital Plaintiff’s Proprietary business Brief plans.
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Intuitive’s Cross- Motion For Summary Judgment And Reply In Support Of Partial Summary Judgment Page 20, lines 17-18 (citing Deposition of Clif Parker (In re da Vinci) at 162:16-25))
Dkt. No. 170-16 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 116 and business plans. Parnell 03/01/2023 Rebuttal Report Page 120 ¶¶ 268-69 Restore-00089490, at -9493
Dkt. No. 170-16 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 116 and business plans. Parnell 03/01/2023 Rebuttal Report
Page 120 ¶ 270 Restore-00089490, at -9493-95, -9495, 9496-9467
Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 39 ¶ 117 to Page 44 ¶ 134 510(k) Submission See ECF No. 157 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 41 ¶ 124
Dkt. No. 128-44, Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. 170-21 Proprietary business and agency Hospital Plaintiff’s communications. Exhibit 124 Foreman 01/18/2023 Report
Page 43 ¶ 131-132 Restore-00086093, at -6100. Dkt. No. 128-44, Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. 170-21 Proprietary business and agency Hospital Plaintiff’s communications. Exhibit 124 Foreman 01/18/2023 Report
Page 44 ¶ 133-134 Restore-00086093, at- 6107–08. May Tr. 17:21- 18:25; 137:23-140:4. Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 46 ¶ 139 (Last Sentence)
510(k) Submission See ECF No. 157 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 124 and business plans. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 56 ¶ 172 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 124 and agency Foreman 1/18/23 communications. Report Page 58 ¶ 175 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 69 ¶¶ 221 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 76 ¶ 242
510(k) Submission See ECF No. 157 Dkt. No. 170-25 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Confidential Hospital Plaintiff’s settlement agreement. Exhibit 130
Dkt. No. 170-27 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 137 and business plans. Deposition of Clifton Parker (October 25, 2022)
Pages 139-141 Dkt. No. 170-27 Dkt. No. 178 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s plans. Exhibit 137 Deposition of Clifton Parker (October 25, 2022)
Page 165 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 39 ¶ 117 to Page 44 ¶ 134 510(k) Submission See ECF No. 157 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 41 ¶ 124 Dkt. No. 128-44, Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. 170-21 Proprietary business and agency Hospital Plaintiff’s communications. Exhibit 124 Foreman 01/18/2023 Report
Page 43 ¶ 131-132 Restore-00086093, at -6100. Dkt. No. 128-44, Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. 170-21 Proprietary business and agency Hospital Plaintiff’s communications. Exhibit 124 Foreman 01/18/2023 Report
Page 44 ¶ 133-134 Restore-00086093, at- 6107–08. May Tr. 17:21- 18:25; 137:23-140:4. Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 46 ¶ 139 (Last Sentence)
510(k) Submission See ECF No. 157 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 124 and business plans. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 56 ¶ 172 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary Hospital Plaintiff’s production methods Exhibit 124 and agency Foreman 1/18/23 communications. Report Page 57 ¶ 175 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report Page 69 ¶¶ 221 Dkt. No. 170-21 Dkt. No. 183 GRANTED. Proprietary business Hospital Plaintiff’s and agency Exhibit 124 communications. Foreman 1/18/23 Report
Page 76 ¶ 242 510(k) Submission See ECF No. 157
Dkt. No. 170-16 Dkt. No. 172 GRANTED. Proprietary Parnell 03/01/2023 production methods Rebuttal Report and business plans.
Page 120 ¶ 268-69 Restore-00089490, at -9493 Dkt. No. 170-16 Dkt. No. 172 GRANTED. Proprietary Parnell 03/01/2023 production methods Rebuttal Report and business plans.
Page 120 ¶ 270 Restore-00089490, at -9493-95, -9495, 9496-9467
Dkt. No. 182-4 Dkt. No. 185 GRANTED. Defendant’s Reply Proprietary Brief in Support of production methods Motion of and business plans. Intuitive to Exclude Testimony of E. Elhauge 1 Dkt. No. 182-7 Dkt. No. 185 GRANTED. Ex. 13 to Proprietary product 2 Supplemental development and Declaration of Ashley business plans. 3 Bass in Support of Motion to Exclude E. 4 Elhauge > Deposition of Kevin 6 May (Nov. 3, 2022) 7 Page 50 8 Dkt. No. 187-2 Dkt. No. 190 GRANTED. 9 Reply Brief of Proprietary product Intuitive Surgical, development and 10 Inc. on Cross- business plans. Motions for Summary 1] Judgment 12 Page 10 = Dkt. No. 187-3 Dkt. No. 190 GRANTED. v 14 Cahoy Supplemental Proprietary product © Dec. Ex. 96 development and 15 Deposition of Kevin business plans. May (Nov. 3, 2022) 16 = Page 60 it
Z 18 0 Dated: April 17, 2024 21 col: Hs 22 RACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 23 United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28
In Re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation (In Re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.