In Re Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg, Debtors. Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Acting as Receiver of Valencia Bank

902 F.2d 768, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7160, 1990 WL 56928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1990
Docket89-55037
StatusPublished
Cited by49 cases

This text of 902 F.2d 768 (In Re Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg, Debtors. Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Acting as Receiver of Valencia Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg, Debtors. Cuyler Wenberg Neta Wenberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Acting as Receiver of Valencia Bank, 902 F.2d 768, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7160, 1990 WL 56928 (9th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

This is an appeal from the decision of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

On February 4, 1987, appellants Cuyler and Neta Wenberg filed a petition for Chapter 13 bankruptcy in the Central District of California. Prior to that date, the Texas bankruptcy court had entered a judgment in favor of the FDIC and against Mr. Wenberg for damages in an amount to be ascertained and for “all costs and attorney’s fees.” The California bankruptcy court held that the award of attorney’s fees and costs was a liquidated debt for the purpose of determining debtor eligibility under 11 U.S.C. § 109(e). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed. In re Wenberg, 94 B.R. 631 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1988). We AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JT Johnson, Jr.
D. Kansas, 2025
In re: Jason Philip Powell
Ninth Circuit, 2022
In re: Patrick Joseph Gavin
Ninth Circuit, 2022
In re: Anna Stahl
Ninth Circuit, 2021
Mark M. Bello
E.D. Michigan, 2019
In re Aparicio
589 B.R. 667 (E.D. California, 2018)
In re: Soames Lane Trust
Ninth Circuit, 2016
General Lending Corp. v. Cancio
505 B.R. 63 (S.D. Florida, 2014)
Mendez v. Salven (In Re Mendez)
367 B.R. 109 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Johnson v. Stemple (In Re Stemple)
361 B.R. 778 (E.D. Virginia, 2007)
In Re Manalad
360 B.R. 288 (C.D. California, 2007)
Guastella v. Hampton (In Re Guastella)
341 B.R. 908 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
In Re Ross
338 B.R. 134 (N.D. Georgia, 2006)
De Jounghe v. Mender (In Re De Jounghe)
334 B.R. 760 (First Circuit, 2005)
In Re Fredricksen
325 B.R. 302 (D. Oregon, 2005)
In Re Arcella-Coffman
318 B.R. 463 (N.D. Indiana, 2004)
In Re Enriquez
315 B.R. 112 (N.D. California, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 F.2d 768, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7160, 1990 WL 56928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cuyler-wenberg-neta-wenberg-debtors-cuyler-wenberg-neta-wenberg-v-ca9-1990.