In Re Crudup

253 S.E.2d 802, 149 Ga. App. 214, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1789
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1979
Docket57064
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 253 S.E.2d 802 (In Re Crudup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Crudup, 253 S.E.2d 802, 149 Ga. App. 214, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1789 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Deen, Chief Judge.

This appeal is brought from an order of the Superior Court of Hall County signed by Judge A. Richard Kenyon which found Attorney Crudup in contempt of court. Although the order contains findings of fact and conclusions of law, no sanctions were imposed against appellant. Code Ann. § 24-105 entitled "Powers of courts to punish for contempt” authorizes the various courts to issue attachments and to inflict summary punishment for contempt of court. Where the trial court issues an order finding appellant in contempt of court but does not impose punishment, no final judgment has been entered and the case is still pending in the court below and this court cannot review *215 the lower court’s decision. See Code Ann. § 6-701; see also Harrell v. Peteet, 134 Ga. App. 210 (214 SE2d 5) (1975).

Argued January 8, 1979 — Decided February 15,1979 — Rehearing denied March 2, 1979 — John N. Crudup, for appellant. JeffC. Wayne, District Attorney, for appellee.

Court of Appeals Rule 14 (a) requires enumerations of error to be filed within twenty days after the case is docketed. "An enumeration of error may not be amended after the time for filing has expired.” Williams v. State, 142 Ga. App. 764 (236 SE2d 893) (1977).

This appeal must be dismissed as premature.

Appeal dismissed.

McMurray and Shulman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton Capital Group, Inc. v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.
596 S.E.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
Chavarria v. Jackson
390 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Presto v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.
388 S.E.2d 719 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Stephens v. Stephens
362 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Payne v. Presley
311 S.E.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Dowdy v. Palmour
304 S.E.2d 52 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Dowdy v. Palmour
298 S.E.2d 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Carter v. Data General Corp.
291 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Burke v. State
266 S.E.2d 549 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Rewis v. Browning
265 S.E.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 S.E.2d 802, 149 Ga. App. 214, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 1789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-crudup-gactapp-1979.