Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Harrell v. Peteet

Harrell v. Peteet

214 S.E.2d 5, 134 Ga. App. 210, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1962
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 7, 1975·No. 50425·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an alleged order holding the appellant in contempt of court. No fine or imprisonment has been imposed. Held:

The court in its order stated that if the contemner does not purge himself of the contempt that "... the Receiver is hereby directed to file a Motion supported by Affidavit declaring Defendant’s failure to comply requesting a hearing for the Defendant to show cause why he should not be confined to jail and fined as provided by law for wilful failure to purge himself of said contempt.” Until further action is taken, the contempt proceeding is pending in the court below and the alleged order is not appealable.

Appeal dismissed.

Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. Peteet, 214 S.E.2d 5, 134 Ga. App. 210, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1962 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

214 S.E.2d 5 (Harrell v. Peteet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hamilton Capital Group, Inc. v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.
596 S.E.2d 656 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2004)
Chavarria v. Jackson
390 S.E.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Payne v. Presley
311 S.E.2d 849 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Dowdy v. Palmour
304 S.E.2d 52 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)
Dowdy v. Palmour
298 S.E.2d 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Carter v. Data General Corp.
291 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
In Re Interest of Wolkow
293 N.W.2d 851 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1980)
In Re Crudup
253 S.E.2d 802 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Lake v. Hamilton Bank of Dalton
251 S.E.2d 177 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Madden v. Madden
558 P.2d 669 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1977)