In Re Cranmer
This text of 253 P.3d 339 (In Re Cranmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 5, 2008, this court suspended the petitioner, Russell B. Cranmer, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 6 months. See In re Cranmer, 287 Kan. 495, 196 P.3d 932 (2008).
Before reinstatement, the petitioner was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action, comply with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2010 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 370), and otherwise comply with Supreme Court Rule 219 (2010 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 370).
On April 8, 2011, Cranmer filed a petition for order of reinstatement. After careful consideration, this court grants Cranmer s petition and reinstates him to the practice of law in Kansas.
It Is Therefore Ordered that Cranmer be reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. Upon the report to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts that the petitioner has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter petitioner’s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.
It Is Further Ordered that this order of reinstatement for Russell B. Cranmer shall be published in the Kansas Reports.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 P.3d 339, 292 Kan. 345, 2011 Kan. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cranmer-kan-2011.