In Re: Courtney Wild
Opinion
Case: 19-13843 Date Filed: 08/07/2020 Page: 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 19-13843 ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM
In re: COURTNEY WILD,
Petitioner.
________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, WILSON, MARTIN, JILL PRYOR, NEWSOM, BRANCH, LUCK, LAGOA, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
A petition for rehearing having been filed and a member of this Court in
active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en
banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service who are not
disqualified having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED
that this case will be reheard en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Judges Jordan, Rosenbaum, and Grant recused themselves and did not participate in the poll.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
967 F.3d 1285 (In Re: Courtney Wild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.