In Re Contempt of Dorsey

879 N.W.2d 263, 499 Mich. 948
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 2016
Docket150298
StatusPublished

This text of 879 N.W.2d 263 (In Re Contempt of Dorsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Contempt of Dorsey, 879 N.W.2d 263, 499 Mich. 948 (Mich. 2016).

Opinion

By order of December 23, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the September 9, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in In re Jones (Docket No. 152595). On order of the Court, the order granting leave to appeal having been vacated in In re Jones, 499 Mich 862 (2016), the application is again considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the family court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to issue the order compelling the appellant to submit to random drug testing as part of her son’s juvenile delinquency proceeding, see MCL 712A.6; Jackson City Bank & Trust Co v Fredrick, 271 Mich 538, 544-545 (1935); (2) whether Michigan recognizes any other exceptions to application of the collateral bar rule, including (a) lack of opportunity for meaningful appellate review of the January 14, 2011 drug testing order; or (b) the appellant’s irretrievable surrender of constitutional guarantees by complying with the drug testing order, see Maness v Meyers, 419 US 449; 95 S Ct 584; 42 L Ed 2d 574 (1975); and (3) whether the appellant has properly preserved question (2) for appellate review. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers or their previously filed supplemental briefs.

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maness v. Meyers
419 U.S. 449 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. Fredrick
260 N.W. 908 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1935)
In re Jones
874 N.W.2d 129 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
879 N.W.2d 263, 499 Mich. 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-contempt-of-dorsey-mich-2016.