In re Contempt of Dorsey

Michigan Supreme Court

In re Contempt of Dorsey

869 N.W.2d 614, 498 Mich. 891

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2015·No. No. 150298·Published

Opinion

reported below: 306 Mich App 571. The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s order holding her in criminal contempt amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on the trial court’s January 14, 2011 order requiring her to submit to drug testing. See In re Hatcher, 443 Mich 426, 438 (1993). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

reported below: 306 Mich App 571. The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s order holding her in criminal contempt amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on the trial court’s January 14, 2011 order requiring her to submit to drug testing. See In re Hatcher, 443 Mich 426, 438 (1993). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

In re Contempt of Dorsey, 869 N.W.2d 614, 498 Mich. 891 (Mich. 2015).

Pincite

869 N.W.2d 614 (In re Contempt of Dorsey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related